An Army at Sea – Provisioning the NZEF Main Body, October 1914

The illustration titled “Provisioning a Warship” presents a dramatic visual inventory of what it took to sustain a single fighting vessel during the Great War. Along the quay are stacked 30 tons of fresh beef, 60 tons of potatoes, cases of preserved vegetables and fruit, salt fish, margarine, cheese, bacon, biscuits, eggs, and even curry powder. The caption notes that these stores provide food only for the officers and men. Ammunition and other operational necessities are excluded.

The image is designed to impress upon the reader the scale of naval sustainment. It reveals that war at sea was fought not only with guns and armour, but also with beef, biscuits, and bulk supplies.

Yet in October 1914, New Zealand did not provide one warship.

It provisioned ten troopships carrying more than 8,500 men and nearly 4,000 horses across half the globe.

The Convoy: Troopships and Escorts

The NZEF Main Body sailed between 15 and 16 October 1914 from four principal ports. The troopships were[1]:

Troopships at Queen’s Wharf. Dickie, John, 1869-1942 :Collection of postcards, prints and negatives. Ref: 1/2-004018-G. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23050707

Wellington

  • HMNZT No. 3 Maunganui – 566 personnel, 204 horses
  • HMNZT No. 6 Orari – 285 personnel, 728 horses
  • HMNZT No. 7 Limerick – 516 personnel, 348 horses
  • HMNZT No. 10 Arawa – 1,318 personnel, 215 horses
The Arawa moored in Wellington, showing Wellington Infantry Battalion men waiting to board their home for six weeks, in this Auckland Weekly News photo.

Auckland

  • HMNZT No. 4 Tahiti – 641 personnel, 282 horses
  • HMNZT No. 8 Star of India – 682 personnel, 395 horses
  • HMNZT No. 12 Waimana – 1,461 personnel, 496 horses

Lyttelton

  • HMNZT No. 9 Hawkes Bay – 970 personnel, 569 horses
  • HMNZT No. 11 Athenic – 1,313 personnel, 339 horses
Troops boarding the Tahiti at Lyttelton in September 1914
Canterbury Museum 1976.96.23

Port Chalmers

  • HMNZT No. 5 Ruapehu – 816 personnel, 244 horses

In total, the Main Body transports carried:

  • 8,568 officers and other ranks
  • 3,820 horses

The October convoy was protected by the Royal Navy armoured cruiser HMS Minotaur, the Imperial Japanese Navy battlecruiser IJN Ibuki, and the New Zealand cruiser HMS Philomel. These escorts provided a protective screen during the voyage to Australian waters and during the onward convoy assembly.

It is important to note, however, that the provisioning calculations in this article relate solely to the ten troop transports and the NZEF personnel and horses embarked upon them. The victualling requirements of HMS Minotaur, IJN Ibuki, and HMS Philomel are not included in the tonnage, ration, forage, or rail calculations presented here.

Institutional Responsibility: Stores versus Sustenance

A clear understanding of New Zealand’s 1914 mobilisation system requires a firm distinction between two complementary but institutionally separate responsibilities, Stores and Sustenance. Although both were essential to raising and maintaining the Expeditionary Force, they fell under different authorities, operated through different administrative chains, and answered to different doctrinal frameworks.

Defence Stores Department: Equipping the Force

The Defence Stores Department was responsible for the material equipment and outfitting of the force. Its remit covered the provision, storage, inspection, and issue of:

  • Uniforms and clothing
  • Arms and accoutrements
  • Ammunition
  • Camp equipment
  • Saddlery and harness
  • General stores and military matériel

In practical terms, Defence Stores ensured that the soldier was clothed, armed, and properly equipped, and that mounted units possessed the necessary saddlery and harness. Its responsibilities were materiel-focused and largely static in character, concerned with procurement, warehousing, accounting, and issue.

It equipped the force.

New Zealand Army Service Corps: Sustaining the Force

Provisioning troops with rations and horses with forage did not fall under Defence Stores. That responsibility lay with the New Zealand Army Service Corps (NZASC), operating under the authority of the Director of Supplies and Transport (DST) and his district subordinates.[2]

Under Mobilisation Orders, Part XI, “Supplies” were defined as the consumable articles required by an army in the field, namely:

  • Food
  • Forage
  • Fuel
  • Light
  • Disinfectants

This definition is operational in nature. It concerns sustainment in motion and in theatre, rather than static stockholding.

For the purposes of this paper, ration and forage calculations will be based on the scale authorised for the 1914 divisional camps. The scale of rations and forage was laid down in the Financial and Allowance Regulations and aligned, as far as local conditions permitted, with the Imperial Regulations for Supply, Transport, and Barrack Services. The camp ration scale provides a consistent and doctrinally grounded basis for estimating the quantities required for embarkation and troopship sustainment.

Thus:

  • Defence Stores equipped the force.
  • The NZASC, under the DST system, sustained it.

This distinction is fundamental. The tonnage calculations associated with troopships, embarkation provisioning, and forage estimates relate to the work of the DST organisation and the ASC supply system, not to the equipment responsibilities of the Defence Stores Department.

Command Structure and Administrative Authority

The mobilisation system established a defined chain of responsibility for supply.

Quartermaster-General (QMG)

  • Ultimately responsible for the provision of supplies.
  • Acted on behalf of the Military Board.
  • Prepared peacetime tenders and wartime contracts.
  • Activated provisional contracts upon notice of hostilities.
  • Completed formal contracts at the first stage of mobilisation.

Director of Supplies

  • Appointed at the first stage of mobilisation.
  • Responsible directly to the QMG.
  • Supervised supply administration.
  • Inspected contract supplies.
  • Arranged delivery times and locations with contractors.

Assistant Directors of Supplies and Transport (ADSTs)

Each military district had an ADST responsible for both administrative and executive supply duties. Their role was to ensure that supply arrangements enabled ordered troop movements and sustained units through mobilisation and concentration.

While no specific embarkation instruction is preserved in the summary above, it is highly likely that the District ADST assumed responsibility for provisioning the troopships allocated to his district. Given that embarkation ports corresponded to district boundaries and that district depots and contracts fell under ADST control, the practical burden of assembling, inspecting, and loading rations and forage would almost certainly have rested at the district level under ADST supervision.

In effect, the QMG contracted, the Director coordinated, and the ADST executed.

NZASC and Seconded ASC Personnel, 1914

In 1914, the NZASC was strengthened by the integration of British Army Service Corps (ASC) officers and senior NCOs. Under reforms implemented prior to the war, four ASC officers served as Assistant Directors of Supplies and Transport in the military districts, supported by four ASC NCO instructors. An additional ASC officer filled the ADST role at General Headquarters.

Headquarters

  • Director of Supplies and Transport – Vacant, General Headquarters, 1914
  • Major Annesley Craven Robinson (ASC) – Assistant Director of Supplies and Transport at General Headquarters; concurrently ADST, Canterbury Military District

Auckland Military District

  • Lieutenant Hubert Harvard Wright (ASC) – ADST
  • Quartermaster Sergeant John Wass (ASC) – NZASC Instructor

Wellington Military District

  • Captain Norman Chivas Hamilton (ASC) – ADST
  • Staff Sergeant Frank Ostler (ASC) – NZASC Instructor

Canterbury Military District

  • Major Annesley Craven Robinson (ASC) – ADST
  • Staff Quartermaster Sergeant Philip Petty (ASC) – NZASC Instructor

Otago Military District

  • Captain Hector Craven Reid (ASC) – ADST
  • Staff Sergeant Major John Walter Frederick Cahill (ASC) – NZASC Instructor

This structure reflected a deliberate policy to embed experienced Imperial ASC personnel within the New Zealand system. It ensured doctrinal alignment with British practice and provided technical competence in supply administration, contracting, inspection, and distribution.

The Missing Commodity: Forage

The drawing itemises food for naval personnel. It does not show forage. For a warship, that omission is logical. For an expeditionary army, it is decisive.

In 1914, forage referred to the daily feed required to sustain horses and draught animals. It consisted primarily of:

  • Oats (grain ration)
  • Compressed chaff (cut straw mixed with grain)
  • Pressed hay (roughage)
  • Bran or feed supplements

A typical 1914 allowance approximated:

  • 6 lb oats per horse per day
  • 12 lb hay or equivalent per horse per day[3]

At sea, this equated to roughly 10 kilograms of feed per horse per day when allowance was made for packing and wastage.

Unlike human rations, forage was:

  • Bulky relative to calorific value
  • Susceptible to moisture
  • Highly flammable when compressed
  • Structurally disruptive to ship trim

The horse did not merely accompany the army. It dictated the convoy’s logistical physics.

The Quantitative Burden

Using the 1914 service ration scale used for the 1914 Divisional camp as a benchmark the requirements for men and horses were[4]:

Per Man Per Day

  • 1½ lb Meat
  • 1½ lb Bread or Biscuit
  • 4 oz Butter
  • 1 oz Cheese
  • ¾ oz Tea
  • ½ oz Coffee
  • 4 oz Sugar
  • 1 lb Potatoes
  • 4 oz Onions
  • 4 oz Jam
  • 2 oz Oatmeal
  • ½ pint Milk or
  • ½ can Condensed Milk
  • ½ oz Salt
  • 1/38 oz Pepper
  • ¼ pound of flour (twice a week)

Per Horse Per Day

  • 6 lb oats
  • 12 lb Chaff
  • 6 lb hay

The convoy, therefore, consumed approximately:

  • 26 tonnes of human rations per day
  • 41.6 tonnes of forage per day
  • Combined 67.6 tonnes daily

For a voyage of approximately forty days:

  • 1040 tonnes of human rations
  • 1664 tonnes of forage
  • Over 2,704 tonnes total

Nearly sixty-two per cent of this weight was forage.

The warship illustration shows perhaps 150–200 tons of food for one vessel’s crew.

The NZEF convoy required that scene to be multiplied tenfold, then supplemented by a far greater invisible mass of grain and hay.

Tendering the War

The provisioning of such quantities required the immediate mobilisation of civilian suppliers. Within days of the declaration of war, the Defence Department issued calls for tenders for the supply and delivery of forage and rations for the Expeditionary Force.

Contemporary newspaper notices from August to October 1914 record invitations for tenders covering:

  • Oats in bulk tonnage
  • Compressed chaff and pressed hay
  • Preserved meat
  • Ship biscuit
  • Sugar, tea, salt
  • Tinned vegetables
  • Condensed milk

These tenders typically specified:

  • Delivery to named ports (Wellington, Auckland, Lyttelton, Port Chalmers)
  • Strict quality inspection by Army Service Corps officers
  • Short closing dates, often within days
  • Immediate delivery schedules prior to embarkation

Such notices demonstrate that the Defence system did not rely on casual purchasing. It mobilised formal contracting mechanisms under urgency conditions.

The warship illustration shows wagons arriving at the quay.

The tenders reveal the contractual machinery that filled those wagons.

Gifts of Fodder: Civil Society and the Logistics of War

While the mobilisation of forage was facilitated through formal tenders and contracts, it was not sustained by contract alone.

Contemporary reporting reveals that a substantial proportion of the forage loaded at Wellington was donated by farmers and rural organisations, so extensively that government purchasing was halted within days of mobilisation.

The New Zealand Farmers’ Co-operative Distributing Company, assisted by branches of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union, undertook to handle gratis the chaff, hay, and associated produce required for the troopships departing Wellington. Initially authorised to purchase supplies on behalf of the Defence Department, the company ceased buying within three days due to the scale of voluntary donations.

The transports Athenic, Limerick, Orari, and Maunganui were supplied entirely without cost to the Government. Donations exceeded requirements.

Among the contributions was a gift of 500 sacks of chaff from Māori donors in Waitapu County, Gisborne, forwarded through Mr Wi Pere. The scale of giving was such that the four ships were loaded with over two million pounds of chaff and hay, amounting to more than 900 tons of forage, in addition to other produce.

Even after the ships were fully provisioned, approximately 250 tons of surplus produce remained in No. 3 Shed, King’s Wharf. This surplus was scheduled for public auction, with proceeds directed to the Prime Minister’s War Fund, converting excess sustenance into benevolent capital for patriotic purposes.[5]

The episode reveals several important characteristics of 1914 mobilisation:

  • Rural production responded immediately and voluntarily
  • Māori communities participated directly in material support
  • Private commercial firms provided handling and logistics without charge
  • Surplus supply was monetised for patriotic fundraising

The forage that dictated the convoy’s logistical physics was not solely a product of state contracting. It was, in large measure, a gift.

Rail Before Sail

Once contracts were awarded under the Director of Supplies and Transport, the stores had to move.

Based on reconstructed tonnage requirements for rations and forage alone, the distribution across embarkation ports may be modelled as follows:

  • Wellington – approximately 978 tonnes
  • Auckland – approximately 850 tonnes
  • Lyttelton – approximately 673 tonnes
  • Port Chalmers – approximately 206 tonnes

If one assumes an average New Zealand Government Railways goods wagon capacity of approximately 15 tons, then rations and forage alone would have required:

  • 65–66 wagons into Wellington
  • 56–57 wagons into Auckland
  • 44–45 wagons into Lyttelton
  • 13–14 wagons into Port Chalmers

In total, approximately 180 railway goods wagons.

It must be emphasised that this calculation remains illustrative rather than literal. It is a planning model designed to convey scale. In practice, stores would not have arrived in perfectly balanced 15-ton consignments, nor would rail have been the sole means of delivery.

Bulk grain and preserved goods certainly moved by rail over long distances. However, once at railheads or within urban centres, onward movement to wharves often depended upon:

  • Horse-drawn drays and carts
  • Contract carriers
  • Port-side hand labour
  • Early motor lorries, which by 1914 were beginning to supplement traditional haulage

The supply chain was therefore layered. Rail provided the long-haul concentration. Horse cartage and emerging motor transport bridged the final distance to the wharf sheds and loading cranes.

Moreover, the wagon calculation excludes coal bunkering, water storage, ammunition, veterinary equipment, and engineering stores. When these are considered, the overall movement pressure on rail and local transport networks would have been significantly greater.

The convoy’s departure was the visible moment.

The concentration of grain, hay, meat, biscuit, and stores from farms, mills, warehouses, and depots across the Dominion was the hidden achievement.

From Territorial Camp to Expeditionary Fleet

Before 1914, New Zealand’s military logistics operated within a predominantly territorial framework:

  • Annual training camps
  • Local market supplementation
  • District supply control
  • Short-duration concentration

The October embarkation required something different:

  • Strategic stockpiling
  • Forecast-based provisioning for fixed-duration sea transit
  • Multi-port coordination
  • Maritime storage planning
  • Integrated rail, cartage, and wharf scheduling

The Defence Stores Department equipped the force. The Army Service Corps, under the Director of Supplies and Transport and his regional subordinates, sustained it. Together, they mobilised national agriculture, railway networks, contract carriers, and port infrastructure within weeks of the outbreak of war.

The Dominion did not merely raise troops.

It activated a logistical system capable of projecting and sustaining them overseas.

Returning to the Image

The illustration of “Provisioning a Warship” captures the spectacle of loading one fighting vessel. It invites admiration for the administrative labour of feeding a single crew.

The NZEF Main Body required that spectacle to be multiplied tenfold, then supplemented by an even larger invisible mass of grain and hay.

If the warship image conveys the complexity of sustainment, the October 1914 convoy reveals its scale.

Conclusion

In October 1914, New Zealand projected more than men across the sea. It projected a logistical ecosystem.

More than 8,500 men and nearly 4,000 horses required approximately 2,704 tonnes of consumable stores for a forty-day voyage. Close to two-thirds of that weight was forage. The concentration of those supplies demanded roughly 180 railway goods wagons, before coal, ammunition, water, and engineering stores were even considered.

These calculations are analytical reconstructions based on the authorised 1914 divisional camp ration and forage scale applied to confirmed embarkation strengths. It remains possible that modified troopship scales were utilised for sea transit, though no specific embarkation ration scale has yet been identified in surviving records. The figures, therefore, represent a reasoned planning model rather than a definitive manifest. It is also highly likely that reprovisioning occurred at staging ports such as Albany in Western Australia and Colombo in Ceylon, reducing the need to carry the full forty-day scale from New Zealand.

Yet mobilisation was not achieved by contract alone. Substantial quantities of forage were donated by farmers, Māori communities, and rural organisations, to such an extent that government purchasing was halted in some districts. Surplus fodder was later auctioned to raise funds for benevolent purposes. Civil society did not merely support the war. It physically fed it.

The illustration of a single warship being provisioned offers a useful visual measure.

The NZEF Main Body demonstrated that the Dominion could replicate that spectacle at an expeditionary scale and sustain it across half the globe through a combination of state administration, railway concentration, commercial handling, and voluntary rural contributions.

.


Notes

[1] “Troopships; Embarkation Orders; Daily Field States; and a large chart of ‘New Zealand Expeditionary Forces – Personnel’ as at 1 June 1915),” Archives New Zealand Item ID R23486740 (Wellington) 1914.

[2] “Regulations – Mobilisation of New Zealand Military Forces,” Archives New Zealand Item No R22432979  (27 April 1914).

[3] “H-19 Report on the Defence Forces of New Zealand for the period 20 June 1913 to 25 June 1914,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives  (1 January 1914), https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1914-I.2.3.2.29.

[4] “H-19 Report on the Defence Forces of New Zealand for the period 20 June 1913 to 25 June 1914.”

[5] “Farmers Liberality,” New Zealand Times, Volume XXXIX, Issue 8838, 15 September 1914, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19140915.2.53.


The New Zealand Battle Ration: Innovation in Tropical Field Nutrition During WWII

Effective military logistics are essential to operational success, particularly in challenging environments such as the tropical conditions faced by Allied forces in the Pacific during the Second World War. New Zealand’s experience during this period highlighted significant logistical and nutritional challenges, prompting innovative approaches to ensure its soldiers’ health and combat effectiveness. Among the most notable developments was the creation of the New Zealand Battle Ration—a specialised field ration explicitly designed to sustain troops operating in harsh tropical climates. This article explores the rapid development, innovative design features, practical testing, international recognition, and lasting legacy of the New Zealand Battle Ration. It underscores its wartime significance and the missed opportunities in the post-war period.

Soldiers eating a meal outdoors, Egypt. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History Branch: Ref: DA-00816-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23083314

Development of the New Zealand Battle Ration

During the Second World War, New Zealand maintained generous and robust ration scales for troops stationed in camps. However, the army initially lacked a dedicated field ration tailored to tropical environments. Early deployments to remote Pacific garrisons, including Fanning Island and Fiji, revealed significant deficiencies in existing rations. This highlights an urgent requirement for a nutritionally balanced, durable field ration for prolonged use under tropical conditions.

The urgency to address this shortfall became critical following Japan’s entry into the war in December 1941. Colonel Salmon, Deputy Quartermaster-General, promptly sought assistance from New Zealand’s Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) to develop specialised emergency rations. The DSIR rapidly prioritised this task, leading to the swift development of the New Zealand Battle Ration starting in late 1941. By early 1943, after rigorous scientific research and testing, practical field trials demonstrated the effectiveness of this innovative ration in sustaining troops operating under challenging tropical conditions.[1]

Before this development, troops deployed in the field relied predominantly on standard camp-scale rations composed mainly of canned goods and easily portable items requiring minimal preparation. Recognising the inadequacy of these provisions for tropical operations, substantial scientific and developmental efforts were initiated to create a specialised and practical solution, culminating in the New Zealand Battle Ration.

Vitamin Content in Service Diets

To ensure that the New Zealand Battle Ration met stringent nutritional requirements, a dedicated team comprising Mr L.W. Tiller, Dr J.C. Andrews, and Dr B.W. Doak conducted extensive research into vitamin fortification. In October 1942, Tiller and Andrews travelled to Australia to study advancements in vitamin fortification techniques, particularly the extraction and application of vitamin C from lucerne (alfalfa). This international collaboration provided critical insights into effectively incorporating vitamins into field rations.

Meanwhile, Dr Doak carried out comprehensive analyses of the vitamin content in potential ration ingredients, explicitly targeting key nutrients such as ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), thiamine (Vitamin B1), and carotene (Vitamin A precursor). He meticulously evaluated these vitamins in various ratios before and after exposure to tropical storage conditions. His work extended to examining army rations’ mineral composition and moisture levels, crucial in determining their durability and nutritional viability in hot, humid climates. The outcome of this rigorous research directly informed the formulation of the New Zealand Battle Ration, ensuring it could maintain nutritional integrity under demanding tropical conditions.

Composition and Features of the New Zealand Battle Ration

The resultant ration was meticulously designed for emergency use during assaults rather than for continuous consumption. Each daily ration was divided into three meals—breakfast, lunch, and tea—offering a well-balanced combination of calories, minerals, and vitamins in a compact and appetising form. The key principle underpinning the ration was to provide sufficient nutrition and energy, maintain troop morale, and ensure practicality under challenging field conditions.

Key features of the New Zealand Battle Ration included:

  • Minimal weight and bulk, specifically designed to fit comfortably into standard-issue haversacks without causing excessive fatigue or restricting mobility.
  • Meals packaged individually, with each meal fully self-contained, eliminating the need for additional utensils beyond mess tins and spoons.
  • Comprehensive inclusion of necessary items such as fuel blocks, waterproof matches, cigarette tobacco, and water sterilisation tablets to ensure self-sufficiency.
  • Robust packaging impervious to water and gases, ensuring durability in tropical environments.
  • Clear instructions printed on toilet paper included in each meal, ensuring ease of preparation under challenging conditions.

Detailed Meal Breakdown:

  • Breakfast:
    • Meat and gravy (3 dehydrated blocks)
    • Curry powder (2 tablets for added flavour)
    • Milk and sugar block (1)
    • Salt tablets (2)
    • Tea tablets (2)
    • Sweet biscuits (1 packet)
    • Mixed fruit block (1)
    • Chewing gum fortified with Vitamins B1 and C (1 packet)
    • Cigarette tobacco and papers (1 packet)
    • Waterproof matches (1 packet)
    • Smokeless fuel blocks for cooking (3)
    • Water sterilising tablets (1 packet)
    • Toilet paper printed with cooking instructions (2 sheets)
  • Lunch:
    • Savoury biscuits (1 packet)
    • Sweet biscuits (1 packet)
    • Cheese block (1)
    • Fruit block (apricots, 1)
    • Barley sugar sweets (1 packet for energy boost)
    • Chewing gum (1 packet)
    • Tea tablets (3)
    • Milk and sugar block (1)
    • Cigarette tobacco and papers (1 packet)
    • Waterproof matches (1 packet)
    • Water sterilising tablets (1 packet)
    • Toilet paper printed with instructions (2 sheets)
  • Tea:
    • Meat and gravy (3 dehydrated blocks)
    • Vegetable block (1, providing essential dietary fibre and nutrients)
    • Sweet biscuits (1 packet)
    • Mixed fruit block (1)
    • Milk and sugar block (1)
    • Salt tablets (2)
    • Tea tablets (3)
    • Chewing gum (1 packet)
    • Cigarette tobacco and papers (1 packet)
    • Waterproof matches (1 packet)
    • Smokeless fuel blocks (3)
    • Water sterilising tablets (1 packet)
    • Toilet paper printed with cooking instructions (2 sheets)

Including cooking items, specifically meat-and-gravy blocks, vegetable blocks, curry powder, and smokeless fuel, was informed by detailed operational feedback stressing hot meals’ positive psychological and physical impact during strenuous operations. In contrast, American forces primarily relied on cold rations like the K-ration at this time, highlighting New Zealand’s unique approach and emphasis on troop welfare.

Packaging Innovations

Given the tropical environment’s challenges—humidity, torrential rains, heat, and rough handling—advanced packaging solutions were essential to preserving the integrity of the New Zealand Battle Ration. Metal containers, traditionally robust, were impractical due to their excessive weight, scarcity during wartime, and difficulty of transport in challenging conditions. Consequently, an innovative approach to packaging materials was crucial, requiring solutions that provided robust protection while maintaining minimal weight and bulk.

A significant breakthrough came with adopting Pliofilm, a flexible and moisture-vapour-proof material suited to wrapping individual food items. This advanced material prevented moisture ingress, significantly extending the shelf life and maintaining the nutritional quality of dehydrated ration components. Wellington-based stationery and publishing firm Coulls Somerville Wilkie Ltd. was commissioned to implement this cutting-edge packaging approach. The company employed a comprehensive, multi-layered packaging strategy:

  • First layer: Individual food items were carefully heat-sealed within Pliofilm wrappers, shielding them from moisture and humidity.
  • Second layer: Each meal was packed into wax-dipped cartons, providing an additional protective barrier against environmental factors such as water and vapour penetration.
  • Third layer: These individually wrapped meals were consolidated into a robust outer wax-dipped carton containing a full day’s ration (breakfast, lunch, and tea). This outer packaging ensured the ration packs remained intact and dry, even under the harshest tropical conditions.

Extensive and rigorous testing validated the effectiveness of this packaging system. Notably, ration packs successfully passed stringent immersion tests, including one severe test involving a 56-hour water submersion after being transported to and from New Caledonia. The exceptional durability and resilience of the packaging conclusively demonstrated its suitability and practicality for tropical military operations, significantly enhancing troop morale and operational effectiveness.

Field Trials and Reception

Initial trials of the New Zealand Battle Ration commenced in early 1943 under the oversight of Major Yerex, Director of Bush Warfare Training. Conducted in New Zealand’s dense bush terrain, these early trials involved experienced troops familiar with operational challenges, providing critical feedback on the ration’s nutritional adequacy, ease of preparation, and practicality under field conditions. The rapid initiation of these trials, within approximately a year after the ration’s development began, highlighted the efficiency and effectiveness of DSIR and military personnel collaboration.

Extensive trials were conducted in New Caledonia, where 200 Battle Ration packs were tested under realistic and demanding conditions, simulating prolonged jungle warfare. Troops participating in these exercises consistently reported high satisfaction with the ration. They highlighted the significant morale boost and physiological benefits of including hot meals. Soldiers appreciated the straightforward preparation process, noting that hot, nutritious meals substantially improved energy levels, reduced fatigue, and positively influenced performance during rigorous physical exertion.

New Zealand soldiers opening boxes of supplies. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History Branch: Ref: 1/2-041657-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22388214

Detailed feedback from troops indicated that the ration’s composition, including dehydrated meats, gravy, vegetables, and flavour-enhancing items such as curry powder, significantly contributed to their operational effectiveness. Moreover, troops valued the thoughtful inclusion of supplementary items like fortified chewing gum, waterproof matches, smokeless fuel blocks, and water sterilisation tablets, recognising these as vital components that enhanced self-sufficiency and operational readiness.

Administrative evaluations were more mixed, with some senior officers expressing reservations about the practicality of rations requiring cooking. These critics favoured simpler, non-cookable rations such as the American K-ration, which was readily available through U.S. supply channels and did not require cooking, thus simplifying logistics. Despite these critiques, the consensus from troops who directly utilised the New Zealand Battle Rations in operational settings was predominantly positive, emphasising the ration’s practical advantages and clear operational benefits. This direct troop feedback ultimately reinforced the ration’s effectiveness and underscored its suitability for field deployment in challenging tropical environments.

Soldiers loading rations into small landing craft, Vella Lavella Island, Solomon Islands. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History Branch. Ref: 1/2-044802-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22493249

International Recognition and Legacy

The innovative New Zealand Battle Ration attracted considerable international acclaim from Allied nations during and immediately after the Second World War. The U.S. Quartermaster Corps Subsistence Laboratory in Chicago conducted extensive comparative analyses of emergency rations from various countries. Their findings praised the New Zealand Battle Ration for its superior compact design, lightweight characteristics, nutritional variety, and effectiveness in tropical climates, positioning it as an exemplar among contemporary Allied rations.

British military authorities were equally impressed, showing substantial interest in adopting New Zealand’s advancements in ration technology. The British War Office requested detailed documentation and insights into the ration’s design, packaging, and nutritional composition, reflecting a clear recognition of its innovative attributes and potential for broader military applications.[2]

Despite the enthusiastic international response, the widespread operational deployment of the New Zealand Battle Ration was ultimately restricted by logistical constraints, predominantly due to the dominance of the American supply chain in the Pacific Theatre. The ready availability of the American K-ration and other U.S.-supplied rations made it challenging for the New Zealand Battle Ration to gain broader traction and regular use.

A crate of 12 K Rations (36 units) produced in 1942. https://www.kration.info/

Regrettably, despite its early wartime innovation, the New Zealand Army did not capitalise upon these significant advancements in packaged nutrition in the immediate post-war years. Instead, they reverted to the pre-war practice of issuing soldiers portable rations equivalent to the in-camp ration scales, overlooking the potential benefits demonstrated during the war.

It was not until 1958 that the New Zealand Army revisited the idea of specialised ration packs, developing a new four-person, 24-hour ration pack specifically designed to streamline food supplies for armoured units. This pack was assembled using readily available commercial products and successfully trialled by the 1 and 4 Armoured Regiments during their 1959 annual camps.[3]

The operational experiences of the New Zealand Special Air Service (NZ SAS) and regular regiments during jungle operations in Malaya further emphasised the necessity for a lightweight, convenient, and nutritionally balanced 24-hour ration pack. Recognising this evolving operational requirement, the New Zealand Army undertook fresh efforts to develop such a pack, incorporating lessons learned from the field and responding to the practical needs of soldiers operating in challenging environments.[4] This renewed approach eventually laid the groundwork for modern ration packs, leaving a lasting legacy that underscores New Zealand’s contributions to innovation and adaptability in military logistics and field nutrition.

Conclusion

The New Zealand Battle Ration represented a remarkable wartime innovation, effectively addressing the’ critical logistical and nutritional challenges of tropical conditions. Its development showcased rapid scientific advancement, practical ingenuity in packaging, and a focus on troop welfare. Although its immediate post-war potential was not fully realised due to logistical constraints, its pioneering legacy eventually informed later ration developments within the New Zealand Army and internationally, cementing its status as a significant contribution to military logistics and field nutrition. Nevertheless, the decision by the New Zealand Army to revert to pre-war rationing practices in the immediate post-war years represented a missed opportunity to stay at the forefront of ration pack innovation. It was not until the late 1950s, influenced by operational experiences overseas, that the New Zealand Army resumed developing modern, specialised ration packs, highlighting the delayed recognition of the long-term value of their wartime innovations.


Notes

[1] “Food For War,” New Zealand Herald, Volume 82, Issue 25202, 15 May 1945, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19450515.2.33.

[2] “DSIR [Department of Scientific and Industrial Research] World War 2 Narratives. No. 10. Dehydrated Foods and Ration Packs. Copy No. 1,” Archives New Zealand Item No R1768268  (1948).

[3] “H-19 Military Forces of New Zealand Annual Report of the General Officer Commanding, for period 1 April 1958 to 31 March 1959,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives  (22 June 1959 1959).

[4] “Supplies: General- Ration Packs: Development and Production,” Archives New Zealand Item No R17189341  (1958 -1967).


The Evolution of Army Catering in New Zealand (1845-1948)

“If you were an army cook on leave and met some of the troops accompanied by their girlfriends, wives or mothers, which would you rather hear them say: “There’s the chap who turns out the great meals I’ve told you about”; or, “That’s the bloke who murders good food?”

Question placed to trainee cooks by Sergeant-Cook Instructor Bourke (Paddy to all the camp) at Waikato Camp, 1942

Over the last two hundred years, the adage attributed to Napoleon, “An army marches on its stomach,” underscored the paramount importance of sustenance in military operations. In the annals of the New Zealand army, this principle has been diligently upheld, with meticulous attention paid to ensuring soldiers are well-fed, notwithstanding the challenges posed by varying locations and conditions. Establishing the New Zealand Army Service Corps (NZASC) units during the tumultuous periods of the First and Second World Wars is a testament to this commitment. NZASC units were principally charged with baking bread, butchering meat, and procuring and distributing fresh and packaged provisions to frontline units, playing a pivotal role in sustaining the morale and effectiveness of New Zealand forces during these conflicts. Even in more recent conflicts, such as those in Southeast Asia during the 1950s and 60s, New Zealand troops operated on ration scales notably more generous than their British counterparts, a testament to the nation’s dedication to the well-being of its service members. However, despite the recognition of logistical efforts in military history, a notable gap remains in the literature concerning the contributions of New Zealand Army cooks. While Julia Millen’s comprehensive work, Salute to Service: A History of the Royal New Zealand Corps of Transport, acknowledges the significance of Cooks from when they became part of the RNZASC in 1948, scant attention has been paid to the preceding 103 years, from 1865 to 1948.

This article draws upon primary sources and aims to redress this oversight by delving into the hitherto unexplored realm of New Zealand Army catering. By shedding light on the endeavours of these unsung culinary heroes, it seeks to enrich our understanding of the multifaceted efforts required to sustain a fighting force, thereby honouring their indispensable contributions to New Zealand’s military heritage.

Since the first New Zealand Militias were created in 1845, there was always a need to feed the militias when called out for service. Given the nature of Militia service and the fact that they would not serve far from their home location, their messing requirements would have been minimal. Some individuals would likely have been selected from within the ranks to collect any rations provided and prepare meals.

With the advent of the volunteer era in 1858, the New Zealand military became a mixed force of Infantry, Cavalry and artillery who, on occasion, would assemble for annual camps where units within a district would assemble and conduct combined training. While rations were paid through District Headquarters and Defence Stores, messing arrangements would be rudimentary, with men selected from within the ranks preparing the meals from the rations sourced from local vendors. This situation was mirrored in the Permanent Militia, which had staffed coastal defence forts and the military depot at Mount Cook in Wellington since the 1880s.

Clutha Mounted Rifles 1899. Camp Cooks. Hocken Collection.

During New Zealand’s involvement in the war in South Africa, the issue of messing arose as large numbers of mobilising men were stationed in camps. Messing arrangements involved a combination of civilian contractors and regimental cooks. However, an inquiry into soldiers’ comfort, housing, and victualling at the Newtown Park Camp and Volunteer Billets revealed widespread dissatisfaction. Numerous complaints were lodged regarding the quality and quantity of rations provided, the low standard, and, at times, the lack of meals prepared by contractors and regimental cooks.[1] In South Africa, rations, following the British scale, were supplied by the British Army Service Corps (ASC), supplemented by fresh mutton acquired from the enemy and cooked by members of the contingent.[2]

After the conclusion of the South Africa War, interest in the military surged, prompting a reorganisation of the volunteer movement into a more robust and structured system of regiments and battalions. Despite discussions in 1904 regarding establishing a New Zealand Army Service Corps (NZASC), no decision was indicated in the Commandant of the Forces’ annual report on its formation.[3]

Further reorganisation in 1908 saw the ASC matter addressed by the Adjutant General, with discussions continuing into 1909. The Defence Act of 1909 disbanded volunteer forces and established the Territorial Force, supported by conscription. Major General Alexander Godley’s appointment as Commandant of the New Zealand Military Forces in December 1910 provided momentum for reform. In his first year, Godley revitalised the military’s organisational structure, made crucial command and staff appointments, and laid plans to develop the NZASC, which, though officially designated in May 1910, remained only a force on paper.[4]

Despite the Defence Stores Department’s existence since 1869, an ASC nucleus was lacking for forming new units. The proposed NZASC envisioned eight Transport and Supply Columns, divided into Mounted and Mixed Brigade units allocated to each of New Zealand’s four Military Districts and was to be organised by British ASC officer Henry Owen Knox, who arrived in New Zealand in June 1911 and later supported by four ASC officers and Warrant Offices from early 1913. While the NZASC would handle the procurement and distribution of rations, receipt and cooking remained a Regimental responsibility.

Under Godley’s command, the Territorial Army underwent rapid organisation, culminating in the inaugural brigade camps held in 1913. During these camps, the newly established NZASC established its initial depots, receiving supplies previously ordered by the Quartermaster General based on expected strength states and ration scales.

Forty-seven candidates across the Territorial Army were selected in October 1912 to undergo a comprehensive month-long training at Trentham. This pioneering catering course encompassed kitchen work and cooking techniques for field conditions, including practical exercises such as constructing and operating field ovens, fry pans, 8 and 20-gallon boilers and camp kettles.

Of the initial candidates, thirty-eight successfully qualified to supervise cooking for a regiment, with an additional seven attaining certification as company cooks. Unfortunately, two candidates were unable to qualify due to illness. For the 1913 camp, the establishment allowed for a Sergeant Cook per regiment, each granted an additional allowance of 1 Shilling 6 Pence a day (equivalent to 2024 NZD $16.16), while qualified company cooks received 1 Shilling a day (equivalent to 2024 NZD $10.10). Those who served as cooks during the camps were excused from further military training for the rest of the year.[5]

At Trentham, an additional course of instruction was conducted in October 1913, attended by sixty-two territorial soldiers. Thirty-two qualified as competent to supervise cooking for a regiment, making them eligible for appointment as sergeant cooks if vacancies existed within their units. Twenty-seven soldiers qualified as assistant or company cooks; unfortunately, three did not meet the qualifications.

By the end of 1913, this initiative provided the New Zealand Military with a potential pool of 104 trained cooks. However, it was recognised that further efforts were necessary to ensure a sufficient number of cooks would be available to meet the messing needs of the Territorial Force in the event of mobilisation.[6]

A System Under Strain, Lessons Unlearned in the Interwar Years

By the late 1930s, nearly two decades after the end of the First World War, there remained a persistent unease about the Army’s ability to feed its soldiers effectively. While institutional reforms had begun, contemporary commentary suggests that many of the fundamental issues experienced during the war had not yet been fully resolved.

A 1937 article in the Auckland Star, written by W. Revell Reynolds, provides a stark and unvarnished account of army catering during the First World War. Drawing on personal experience across training camps, Egypt, and Gallipoli, Reynolds described a system characterised not by scarcity, but by failure in execution.

Food, he noted, was often adequate at the point of issue, but was rendered unpalatable or even inedible through poor preparation. Cooks were frequently untrained and, in many cases, selected from those seeking to avoid frontline duties rather than for any culinary competence. Officers, for their part, were described as largely ignorant of catering and nutrition, with institutional focus placed elsewhere.

More concerning were allegations of systemic weaknesses in control and accountability. Reynolds pointed to instances of misappropriated allowances, questionable quality of supplied goods, and the hoarding or misallocation of rations. Whether exaggerated or not, such perceptions highlight a broader lack of confidence in the integrity of the supply and catering system at the time.

Perhaps most significantly, Reynolds drew a direct connection between poor nutrition and operational effectiveness. The absence of basic dietary components such as fresh vegetables, fats, and stimulants was linked to widespread illness, particularly dysentery and other gastrointestinal conditions, which were endemic in theatres such as Gallipoli. In this sense, catering was not merely a matter of comfort, but of survival.

Reynolds’ account suggests that the issue was not supply alone, but the absence of a professional system capable of turning rations into effective sustainment.

His concluding concern was forward-looking. Writing in 1937, Reynolds questioned how the Army intended to feed its soldiers in any future conflict, suggesting that without meaningful reform, the same deficiencies would re-emerge under the pressures of mobilisation.

The outbreak of the Second World War would force that reform. Under the pressures of mobilisation, the Army moved decisively toward a more professional, standardised, and controlled system of catering and supply, laying the foundations for the modern military catering capability.

The declaration of war and subsequent mobilisation halted any plans for further peacetime training of cooks, as all efforts shifted towards providing trained personnel for the New Zealand Expeditionary Force. The NZASC expanded its role at home and as part of the NZEF, taking on responsibility for bakeries and butcheries. However, despite ensuring the provision of necessary food items to units, cooking remained the responsibility of each unit. Cooks were trained at the Army School of Instruction at Trentham, with further training conducted at NZEF camps in the United Kingdom.In New Zealand, military and civilian cooks fulfilled the necessary messing functions at various mobilisation and Territorial Camps, while unit cooks supported units in the field.

Cooks with first frozen mutton received in the desert during WWI. Hood, D : Photographs relating to World War I and II. Ref: 1/2-067444-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23212994
Wellington Regiment cooker, and men, within 1000 yards of the front line, Colincamps, France. Royal New Zealand Returned and Services’ Association :New Zealand official negatives, World War 1914-1918. Ref: 1/2-013209-G. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22604005

During the interbellum period, the Army School of Instruction in Trentham ceased operations in 1921, with few records of formal training for Army cooks until 1938.

In 1937, the Special Reserve Scheme was introduced to provide personnel for the coast defence batteries and three infantry battalions of Fortress troops. Under this scheme, single soldiers underwent three months of continuous training, followed by a three-year commitment to attend training for 10 days annually, with an obligation to report for service within New Zealand in the event of a national emergency. During their three months of training, they were also allowed to attend technical college, free of charge, on a course of their choice. Facilitating the necessary training, the Army School of Instruction (ASI) was re-established at Trentham, supported by District Schools of Instruction (DSI) at Narrow Neck, Trentham, and Burnham.[7]

The first account of cooks participating in this training scheme saw a batch of seventy-two, nine of whom were cooks, enter Trentham in August 1938 for their initial military training, beginning their vocational training in January 1939 with three of the cooks going to Narrow Neck in Auckland and the other six to Fort Dorset.[8] Reviewing the work of the officers and men under his command, the Officer Command the Central Military District, Colonel E Puttick, commented in April 1939 that “there had never been any complaint about the food, and it was clear that the special reservists who had taken cookery training as their vocational course in the Army Training School at Trentham had received excellent instruction”.[9]

While Colonel Puttick may have been satisfied with the catering arrangements in his district, there was dissatisfaction with the quality of rations and cooks in the northern and Southern Districts. In May 1939, reports of sub-standard rations, the performance of civilian cooks at territorial Camps resulting in their packing up and walking out mid camp and the refusals of Territorial soldiers to work on mess fatigue parties led the District Commander, Colonel P.H Bell to call an all-day conference with his Quartermaster and Quartermaster Sergeants to consider the Army’s food problems, including the quality of rations and most importantly how to resolve the fundamental problem that the Army had no cooks of its own, engaging civilians for the period of camps. [10] In the Northern District, a deputation of civilian cooks led by Mr W. R Connolly, a cook with 37 years’ experience of cooking in military camps, went directly to the officer of the Star Newspaper with their grievances following a ten-day camp with A Squadron of the 4th Mounted Regiment. Joining the squadron on 3 May at Cambridge, they deployed to Rotorua, Tauranga, and Paeroa, finishing up at Narrow Neck on 12 May. The cook’s issue was that they were civilians contracted to work in a fixed camp and not on the march, and they were at much reduced rates than they had received before the depression.[11]

Despite these challenges, the outbreak of the Second World War in September 1939 prompted a renewed focus on army catering. On the declaration of war, it was decided that New Zealand would contribute an Expeditionary Force. Initially, a “Special Force” was planned, with one battalion in each of the three military districts. The Special Force was later expanded into the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2 NZEF).

Three weeks before the Special Force encamped at Trentham, Acting Prime Minister Mr Peter Fraser and Minister of Defence Mr Frederick Jones visited the site to inspect preparations for the new mobilisation camp. During their visit, the Commandant of the ASI, Major J I Brook, hosted them for lunch. Impressed by the meal, they specifically requested the Regular Force Mess diet sheet and received positive feedback from regular soldiers on the meal quality. The Ministers inquired about the possibility of providing similar meals to the men of the Special Force. In response, Major Brook suggested that providing the same meals to the Special Force could be achieved if cooks were available and ample rations were provided. Following this discussion, permission was granted to establish an Army School of Cookery under the ASI.[12]

By December 1939, under the tutelage of a fully qualified army cookery instructor, the first batch of thirty-two men had completed their training at the Army School of Cookery, with a second batch completing their training on 8 December. Initial training was on the standard equipment found in any camp, typically three ovens able to bake for 120 men. Once qualified in the basics of camp cooking, training on the Portable Cooker No. 1 and other field cookery followed.[13]

As the 2NZEF established itself in Egypt, the significance of quality cooking was duly recognised. Although the Cooks selected for the First Echelon underwent training courses at the Trentham School of Cookery,  they were not qualified cooks under Middle East conditions. They required instruction on breaking down bulk rations and handling food in the field, so arrangements were made to train New Zealand cooks at the Army School of Cookery in Cairo. Additionally, the services of a non-commissioned officer (NCO) from the 7th British Armoured Division was enlisted as an instructor to the 2 NZEF under the supervision of the Divisional Supply Column officer. With the second Echelon diverted to England, General Freyberg consulted the manager of the Lyons chain of restaurants, who was an adviser to the War Office on army catering, with arrangements made with the War Office in London for the secondment of four NCOs to the 2 NZEF to form the nucleus of the 2 NZEF cookery school. These NCOs accompanied the Second Echelon troops from England to Egypt.[14]

A typical New Zealand field cookhouse in the desert during World War II. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History Branch :Photographs relating to World War 1914-1918, World War 1939-1945, occupation of Japan, Korean War, and Malayan Emergency. Ref: DA-00798-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23050225

With this reorganisation and expansion, the NZEF cookery school conducted thorough training and testing for cooks. Starting from February 1941, all cooks were required to be qualified either at the NZEF school or the Middle East school before being eligible for extra-duty pay.[15]

As the war progressed, the Army School of Cookery at Trentham continued to run regular courses. However, the demand for cooks necessitated the DSIs to conduct cookery instruction to train men as they were called up for the NZEF and Home Defence. In addition to male soldiers training as cooks, from 1939, the first females from Auckland Womans Service Corps were employed as cooks in Papakura Camp to supplement the civilian and military cooks. Although on the Army payroll, the initial female cooks were not considered serving soldiers. By June 1941, fifteen female cooks were working across all the Military districts. However, it was not until July 1942 that approval was given for the New Zealand Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC)  in New Zealand, formally establishing these female cooks as part of the military establishment.[16]

Cook from the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps putting meat in an oven to roast, for men at a World War II military camp in New Zealand. New Zealand Free Lance : Photographic prints and negatives. Ref: PAColl-8602-40. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22895614

By October 1942, three hundred men of the Territorial Force had received training at Ngawahiwaha Camp. The established ratio for cooks to troops was one cook for every 50 men, two for 100, three for 150, and an additional cook for every 100 additional men. Throughout the Army, the standard of cooking, in terms of variety and quality, had seen significant improvement. It was widely acknowledged that a properly trained army cook could secure employment in a civilian hotel or restaurant upon demobilisation.[17]

Sergeant “Paddy” Bourke, veteran army cook, turns the roast. He was in Egypt with the Expeditionary Force of a generation ago; (Evening Post, 13 April 1940). Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/17717327

In May 1944, the use of WACs as cooks had become a normalised and essential function of the war effort, with an article in the Dominion newspaper detailing the work of the 65 WAACs on the messing staff of Trentham Camp and providing details of the training of the latest batch of eighteen female cooks who had just completed a three-week cooking course the Trentham ASI.[18]It’s essential to recognise that New Zealand was not operating in isolation but rather observing developments across the armies of the British Empire as they transitioned from the regimental cook system to a more centralised and professional model. In the United Kingdom, the Cook trade was under the control of the Army Catering Corps (ACC) upon its creation in March 1941, forming as a subsidiary element of the Royal Army Service Corps Supply Branch. Australia followed suit in 1943, establishing the Australian Army Catering Corps. Canada took a similar approach, forming the Royal Canadian Army Service Corps (RCASC) Catering Wing at No. 1 Reinforcement Unit in Britain in August 1942 to train cooks for the Army.

A cook with the 22 New Zealand Battalion, stokes up his fire in the forward areas near Rimini, Italy, 21
September 1944 during World War II. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History
Branch

The Canadian Army’s experience was that many cooks had previously been members of their unit. However, experience revealed that they were not necessarily skilled soldiers and often functioned as poor cooks tasked with feeding their comrades. Consequently, starting in 1942, all cooks were transferred to the RCASC, which then assigned them to the various units they were to serve. This change resulted in a rapid improvement in cooking standards.[19]  Although New Zealand had adopted other British logistical organisational changes, such as the formation of the Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, with enthusiasm, it was more reserved about any changes to its cooks, combining cooks into a single corps was not a wartime priority.

In 1944, New Zealand commenced the demobilisation process, which included disbanding the Home Guard and the standing down of elements of the Territorial Force. By the war’s conclusion in 1945, most of the forces stationed at home underwent rapid demobilisation. The 2NZEF was disbanded by 1946, aligning with the downsizing trend seen in many Western militaries. However, despite this size reduction, the Government and the Army hesitated to revert the military to its pre-war dimensions and structure. Instead, they opted to reorganise it into what became known as the Interim Army.

New Zeland Army Order 60/1947 of 1 August 1947 detailed the trade classification and promotion requirements of the Regular Force. This order retained cooks as two specific All Arms trades;

  • Cooks, Hospital. A Group A trade applicable to All Arms, including the New Zealand Army Nursing Service (NZANS)
  • Cooks (other than hospital cook). A Group B trade applicable to All Arms, including the NZWAAC

The Commandant of the ASI set the syllabus for the Cooks, hospital, and Cooks (other than hospital cooks). During his period, there was no steward’s trade.[20]

In 1947, three officers and four NCOs were brought out from Britain to raise the standards of catering in the New Zealand Army. This task included providing training and instruction in cooking and catering and guidance on ration scales and meal planning. With the New Zealand Army perceived as too small for a stand-alone Catering Corps, considering that the NZASC was responsible for the Supply function, Butchers and Bakers, it made sense to emulate the Canadian model and bring all cooks under the umbrella of the RNZASC.

To facilitate this transition, the Army Board approved the formation of a Catering Group as a section of the RNZASC. It issued New Zealand Army Instruction (NZAI) 2049 on 15 February 1948 detailing the Supplies and Transport Catering Group (STCG) formation. Initially, the STCG comprised of;

  • A Staff Officer (Catering) in the Directorate of Supplies and Transport at Army Headquarters.
  • District Catering advisers (NC0s) on the staff of the Districts Assistant Director Supply and Transport (ADST)
  • Instructors on the staff of the Army School of Instruction to operate a Catering Wing.
  • Cooks and kitchenhands on unit peace establishments.

The function of the STCG was to

  • To train and provide unit cooks and kitchen hands.
  • Instruction in and supervision of the management of the Army ration scale.
  • Improvement of standard of food preparation and cooking.
  • Advice on the installation and instruction in the operation of cooking appliances and kitchen equipment.
  • Advice on the layout of mess buildings.[21]

Despite NZAI 2049 bringing all army catering services under the jurisdiction of the RNZASC, the Cooks trade remained dispersed among various units. However, this issue was addressed with the implementation of NZAI 2147 in September 1948.[22]

No 2147. SUPPLIES AND TRANSPORT CATERING GROUP, RNZASC
NZAI 1319 and 2049 are hereby cancelled.

  1. Approval has been given for the formation of a catering Group in RNZASC.
    This group will be known as the Supplies and Transport Catering Group (abbreviated title STCG).
  2. The functions of the STCG are –
    a. To train and provide unit, &c, cooks and messing staffs.
    b. Instruction in and supervision of the management of the Army Ration Scale.
    c. The preparation, cooking and serving of all rations.
    d. Advise on the installation and instruction in the operation of cooking appliances and kitchen equipment.
    e. Advise on the layout of mess buildings.
  3. Initially the STCG will comprise-
    a. A Staff Officer (Catering) on the Directorate of Supplies and Transport at Army HQ.
    b. District catering advisers (NCOs) on the staff of ADs ST District.
    c. Instructors on the staff of ASI to operate a “Catering Wing”.
    d. Messing Staff of all units
  4. In order to implement para 3 above, the following action will be taken:-
    a. From the date of publication of this instruction soldiers classified as “kitchen hands” or “Mess Orderly” will be classified as “probationer cook” or “mess steward” respectively. The terms “kitchen hands” or “mess orderly” will no longer be used.
    NOTES: –
    (i) For star classification purposes “probationer cooks” will form the “learner: class of the group “B” trade of cook and will be treated as Group “D” tradesmen
    (ii) Whenever the term “messing staffs” is used in this instruction, it will included “cooks,” “probationary cooks,” and “mess stewards”
    b. All cooks, probationer cooks, and mess stewards, other than of the NZWAC, will be posted to RNZASC.
    c. All messing staffs. including NZWAC messing staffs, in districts will be carried on the establishments of district ASC Coys under the sub heading of STCG.
    d. OsC Districts will allot messing staffs to units on the recommendations of DA DsST.
    e. Messing staffs, including NZWAC messing staffs, of Army HQ units will be carried on the establishments of the respective units under the sub heading STCG.
  5. STCG messing staff strengths will be assessed according to unit messing strengths as follows:-
    a. Unit messing strengths will be taken as establishment strength less 20 per cent (to allow for personnel Living out).
    b. Cooks. – Cooks will be allocated to units on the following scale:
    i. One cook per unit all ranks (or portion thereof) on unit messing strength up to a total of 650.
    ii. One extra cook p er 90 all ranks (or portion thereof) on unit messing strength in excess of 650.
    iii. One extra cook for each cookhouse in excess of one.
    iv. In addition, one chief cook (WO or NCO) for each unit. The rank of this WO or NCO shall be dependent on the strength of the messing staff serving in the unit concerned,
    in accordance with the scale laid down in para 6 below.
    c. Probationer Cooks:-
    i. Two probationer cooks to each kitchen where cooking is carried out for messing strength of 65 or under.
    ii. Four probationer cooks to each kitchen where cooking is carried out for messing strength in excess of 65
    d. Mess Stewards:
    i. One mess steward for each 25 all ranks (or portion thereof) on unit messing strength.
    ii. In addition, one mess steward for each 6 officers (or portion thereof) on unit messing strength up to a total of 42 officers.
    iii. When the number of officers exceeds 42, one extra mess steward for each 9 officers ( or portion thereof) on unit strength in excess of 42).
    iv. Mess stewards in any mess to include at least one NCO, except when total number of mess stewards is less than 3.
  6. In calculating ranks of messing staff, the following guide will be used: In every 69 messing staff OR’s carried on establishment under STCG there may be 21 NCOs from Corporal upwards on the following scale:
    One Warrant Officer.
    Two Staff Sergeants.
    Six Sergeants.
    Twelve Corporals.
  7. The chief cook in any unit will rank as the senior member of the messing staff, irrespective of the rank of the senior mess steward. He will be responsible for:
    a. The proper functioning of the messing staff.
    b. Close co-operation with the unit messing officer.
    c. Training of probationer cooks.
  8. Amended establishments will be issued shortly.
New Zealand Army Instruction 2147, 15 September 1948

With this new directive, New Zealand Army cooks (NZWAC cooks and stewards, which remained a separate corps but were under technical control of the RNZASC for catering purposes, until 1977 when they joined the RNZASC) were finally consolidated into a single corps, allowing for a standardised training syllabus. Additionally, to enhance the catering function and provide a comprehensive messing service, the Stewards trade was formalised as part of the RNZASC. By the end of 1948, the groundwork had been laid for the RNZASC Catering trade to support the evolving New Zealand army.

In conclusion, the evolution of Army catering in New Zealand from 1845 to 1948 reflects a journey marked by adaptability, innovation, and a commitment to sustaining the morale and effectiveness of New Zealand’s military forces. During this period, New Zealand’s military catering underwent a significant transformation from rudimentary messing arrangements in the early militia days. However, the importance of well-fed troops was consistently recognised, as evidenced by the efforts to improve messing arrangements, the establishment of training programs for cooks, and the integration of civilian and military personnel into the catering function. Despite challenges such as dissatisfaction with rations and the shortage of trained cooks, the New Zealand Army continually sought to enhance its catering capabilities, particularly in response to the demands of wartime mobilisation.
The establishment of the Army School of Cookery, the integration of female cooks into the military establishment, and the adoption of international best practices, such as those observed in the British and Canadian armies, demonstrate New Zealand’s commitment to modernising its catering services and ensuring the provision of quality meals for its troops.
By consolidating army catering services under the RNZASC umbrella and formalising the Cooks and Stewards trades, the New Zealand Army laid the groundwork for a more structured and professional catering function as the country transitioned into the post-war era. By 1948, the stage was set for the RNZASC Catering trade to play a pivotal role in supporting the evolving needs of the New Zealand army, reflecting a legacy of culinary excellence and dedication to service.


Notes

[1] “Newtown Park Camp (Inquiry into Conduct of),” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1901 Session I, H-19a  (1901).

[2] “New Zealand Contingent (No 1): Extracts from Reports by Major Robin, Commanding New Zealand Contingent, to Officer Commanding Forces,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1900 Session I, H-06a  (1900).

[3] J Babington, “Defence Forces of New Zealand (Report on the) by Major General J.M Babington, Commandant of the Forces.,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1904 Session I, H-19  (1904).

[4] Based on the British logistics system the NZASC was to be responsible for the Transport and the supply of forage, rations and fuel. The supply and maintenance of all small-arms, ammunition, accoutrements, clothing, and field equipment Stores was to remain a responsibility of the Defence Stores Department which in 1917 became the New Zealand Army Ordnance Corps. Robert McKie, “Unappreciated Duty: The Forgotten Contribution of New Zealand’s Defence Stores Department in Mobilising the New Zealand Expeditionary Force in 1914: A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand” (Massey University, 2022).

[5] “H-19 Report on the Defence Forces of New Zealand for the Period 28 June 1912 to 20 June 1913,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives  (1913).

[6] “Military Forces of New Zealand (Report by the Inspector General of Ther Overseas Forces on the),” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1914 Session I, H-19a  (1914).

[7] “H-19 Military Forces of New Zealand, Annual Report of the Chief of the General Staff,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, (1938).

[8] “Vocational Training,” Wairarapa Times-Age, , 17 January 1939.

[9] “Military Camps,” Evening Post, Volume CXXVII, Issue 80, , 5 April 1939.

[10] “Army Cooks,” Auckland Star, Volume LXX, Issue 103, , 4 May 1939.

[11] “Walked out Army Cooks,” Auckland Star, Volume LXX, Issue 114, , 17 May 1939.

[12] “Soldier Cooks,” King Country Chronicle, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4856,, 1 November 1939.

[13] “Diet for Troops,” King Country Chronicle, Volume XXXIII, Issue 4856,, 1 December 1939.

[14] William Graham McClymont, To Greece, vol. 4 (War History Branch, Department of Internal Affairs, 1959), 23.

[15] Thomas Duncan MacGregor Stout, New Zealand Medical Services in Middle East and Italy, vol. 12 (War History Branch, Department of Internal Affairs, 1956), 47.

[16] Iris Latham, The Waac Story (Wellington, New Zealand1986), 1-4.

[17] “Moral Builders NZ Army Cooks,” Bay of Plenty Times, Volume LXXI, Issue 13760,, 1 October 1942.

[18] “Waac’s New Role,” Dominion, Volume 37, Issue 207, , 30 May 1944.

[19] Arnold Warren, Wait for the Waggon: The Story of the Royal Canadian Army Service Corps (McClelland, 1961).

[20] “Special New Zealand Army Order 60/1947 – the Star Classification and Promotion of Other Ranks of Ther Regular Force,”(1947).

[21] “New Zealand Army Instruction 2049 – Supplies and Transport Catering Group, Rnzasc,”(1948).

[22] “New Zealand Army Instruction 2147 – Supplies and Transport Catering Group, Rnzasc,”(1948).


The Gruber Ration Pack

Emperor Haile Selassie 1935 mobilisation order to Ethiopian Forces to fight against Mussolini’s Invading Italian forces.

“Everyone will be mobilised and all boys old enough to carry a spear will be sent to Addis Ababa . Married men will take their wives to carry food and cook. Those without wives will take any woman without a husband.”

The supply of rations is not a traditional Ordnance responsibility; however, with the rationalisation of New Zealand Army Logistics in 1979, the RNZAOC assumed responsibility from the Royal New Zealand Army Service Corps (RNZASC) for the Supply of Rations and Fuel. Part of these responsibilities was the manufacture of Ration Packs, which was carried out by the Ration Pack Production Section (RPPS) in Trentham. In addition to the ration packs produced by the RPPS, the New Zealand Advanced Ordnance Depot (NZAOD) in Singapore assumed responsibility in 1979 for the production of the “Gruber Pack” a unique ration pack designed to supplement the standard ration packs in the tropical conditions of South East Asia. Never told before, this article provides the background on the “Gruber Pack”.

It is a necessity for rations to be provided to soldiers on the move or when situated away from their normal home base with the necessary to supply rations based on:

  • the individual,
  • the small group (squad, section, platoon), and
  • the large group (company size or larger).

Dramatic improvements have occurred over the last two hundred years that have seen the improvement of military field rations. led by the invention of the can and then preservation techniques, including drying and freeze-drying to the modern retort pouches that are now the staple of modern Military Ration packs.

New Zealand traditionally followed the British lead regarding military field rations, with the British army issue ration biscuit, the ‘Huntley & Palmers Army No 4’ and tinned bully beef the staple during the First World War. The Second World War would boost the technology of military field rations, with the United Kingdom developing military field rations for use worldwide and the United States in parallel developing 23 different military field rations and ration supplements.

New Zealand would take its first steps in developing a military field ration in 1958 when trials were conducted to develop;

  • 24-hour, four-man ration pack for armoured units, and
  • a 24-hour, one-man for infantry units.

The results of these trials were the development of the following Ration packs.

  • One-Man 24-Hour Ration Pack (Canned) – (one man/one day) for use when individual feeding is necessary, e.g. patrols. Suitable for continuous use for up to seven days. A combination of tinned and dry items designed for reheating, although tinned food can be eaten hot or cold. There were three different menus related to this ration pack.
  • One-Man 24-Hour Ration Pack (Lightweight) – An individual ration (one man/one day) for use when individual feeding was necessary, e.g. patrols. Suitable for continuous use for up to seven days. As the items in this pack are dehydrated, they should not have been used in areas where water is unavailable. Designed to provide three meals per ration pack.
  • Ten Man Ration Pack – A composite ration of tinned foods. Designed for reheating in communal feeding in multiples of Ten.
Canned Ration Pack
1986 Individual Contents of the One Man, 24-Hour Ration Pack (Canned)

By 1976 these ration packs had been in service for several years with little work carried out in developing them further.  To supplement these ration packs, a habit had evolved where soldiers, when deploying into the field, would take additional “Bits and Pieces” such as potatoes, onions, curry etc., to supplement the meagre “ration pack”.

In 1976,  Warrant Officer Class Two J. A Gruber, the Catering Warrant Officer, 1 RNZIR in Singapore, took note and decided to design a New Zealand supplementary pack based on tropical needs to enhance the 24 Hour Ration Pack used by soldiers living in the field for weeks on end, and the “Gruber Pack” was developed.

The origins of the Gruber Pack date back to the Vietnam era when the idea of a supplementary ration pack originated. In those days, the United States Army provided a Combat Composite Pack monthly to each company. The Combat Composite Pack contained extra “goodies” such as cigarettes, gum, fruit juice, tins of fruit, etc., today termed jack rats.  The supplementary pack that WO2 Gruber designed was intended to supplement the existing 24-hour ration pack and was to be consumed on the ration of one Gruber to five 24-hour packs.

The actual components of the Gruber Pack would vary from time to time but were a combination of tinned and dry items and based on the daily nation allowance for Singapore, which in 1986 was SDG $6.11.

Designed to be eaten by an individual over 24 hours, Gruber Packs needed half a litre of water to reconstitute the beverages and had a nutritional value of 2433Kcals. Given the climate and components used, a Gruber Pack had a shelf life of two years.

Gruber Packs were assembled on an as-required basis from locally purchased components by work parties from 1RNZIR, initially under the control of the NZ Supply Platoon, RNZASC until 1979 and then by the NZAOD until 1989.

The components would be carefully packed into plastic bags to keep them dry and safe, with individual packs packed, ten to a fiberboard carton.

Technical Data for the Gruber pack was;

  • Gross weight 10.2 Kg per carton of ten.
  • Individual pack measurement 40.6mm x 21.4mm x 33mm.
  • Volume .028m3 or 1.14 cu ft.

MENU

  • Chicken Curry/Beef curry/Mutton Curry 170gm. Tin: 1
  • Pea/Mixed Vege 184gm Tin: 1
  • Fruit Cocktail 248gm Tin: 1
  • Cornflakes 60gm Pkt: 1
  • Instant Noodles 85gm Pkt: 1
  • Herring in Tomato sauce/Pork in Tin/Luncheon Meat 98gm Tin: 1
  • Tea Bags Bags: 2
  • Instant Coffee Sachet: 3
  • Milo Sachet: 2
  • Raisins 42gm Pkt: 1
  • Chewing Gum Packet: 2
  • Non-Dairy Creamer 3gm Pkt: 6
  • Toilet Paper Sheets: 5
  • Salt Sachet: 2
  • Pepper Sachet: 2
  • Sugar Sachet: 6
  • Fruit Drink Container: 1
  • Tomato Sauce Sachet: 2
  • Chilli Sauce Sachet: 2
  • Matches Packet: 1
  • Kleenex Tissues Packet: 1

The Gruber Pack was unique to the New Zealand Forces in Singapore, and following the withdrawal of New Zealand Forces from Singapore in 1989, the Gruber Pack disappeared from the New Zealand Military ration menu. However, trials to upgrade the in-service ration packs had been underway since 1986, and many of the lessons learnt from the Gruber pack were absorbed into the new ration packs that began to be manufactured by the RNZAOC in 1990.