Where the year to June 1871 was one of consolidation after Imperial withdrawal, the financial year 1871–72 was one of settling routine. The Store Department now had a full year of independent colonial operation behind it. Its small body of storekeepers, clerks, armourers, arms cleaners and magazine keepers continued to support the Armed Constabulary, Militia and Volunteers, while the Inspector of Stores maintained the wider system of inspection and accountability.
The surviving accounts show that this activity was conducted on a more modest financial footing than the earlier draft suggested. The Store Department spent £2,607 2s. during the year, while the separate Inspector’s Department spent £1,244 7s. 6d. The distinction matters: inspection and departmental storekeeping were related functions, but Parliament accounted for them under separate votes.
Legislative and Financial Setting
The financial framework for 1871–72 continued under the Defence and Other Purposes Loan Act 1870. Its schedule authorised up to £160,000 for colonial defence costs, charges, expenses and liabilities for the year ending 30 June 1872, approximately NZ$28.8 million using the article’s working conversion of £1 = NZ$180 in 2026 values.[1]
The Appropriation Act 1871 applied funds to the service of the year ending 30 June 1872. The detailed outturn was subsequently published in the Public Accounts for 1871–72 and summarised in the Colonial Treasurer’s Financial Statement of 20 August 1872.[2]
The conversion to 2026 New Zealand dollars is indicative only. It is used to convey scale rather than to imply a precise modern purchasing-power equivalence.
Confirmed Store Department Expenditure
Vote 62, Store Department, recorded the following expenditure for the twelve months from 1 July 1871 to 30 June 1872:
Category
Actual expenditure
Approx. 2026 NZD
Storekeepers and clerks
£995 16s. 8d.
$179,250
Armourers and arms cleaners
£1,321 1s. 6d.
$237,794
Magazine keepers
£147 11s. 0d.
$26,559
Rent, advertising and contingencies
£142 12s. 10d.
$25,675
Total actual expenditure
£2,607 2s. 0d.
$469,278
The account is significant because it shows where the department’s effort was concentrated. Armourers and arms cleaners accounted for just over half of Vote 62, reflecting the labour required to inspect, clean and repair weapons distributed throughout the colony. Storekeepers and clerks formed the next-largest component, while magazine keeping and general operating expenses were comparatively small.[3]
Appropriation Compared with Expenditure
Measure
Amount
Approx. 2026 NZD
Original appropriation
£2,641 17s. 6d.
$475,538
Additional liabilities
£15 4s. 2d.
$2,738
Total authority
£2,657 1s. 8d.
$478,275
Actual expenditure
£2,607 2s. 0d.
$469,278
Saving
£49 19s. 8d.
$8,997
The department therefore finished the year £49 19s. 8d. below its total spending authority. This was a small saving of about 1.9 per cent, suggesting close alignment between the provision approved by Parliament and the expenditure actually incurred.
The Separate Inspector’s Department
The Inspector of Stores was not charged to Vote 62. The inspection function appeared under Vote 61, the Militia and Volunteers Inspector’s Department. The Public Accounts recorded:
Inspector’s Department
Actual expenditure
Approx. 2026 NZD
Salaries
£960 0s. 0d.
$172,800
Travelling expenses and contingencies
£284 7s. 6d.
$51,188
Gross expenditure
£1,244 7s. 6d.
$223,988
Amount of main vote
£1,160 0s. 0d.
$208,800
Excess transferred to supplementary authority
£84 7s. 6d.
$15,188
The £284 7s. 6d. spent on travelling and contingencies is firmer evidence of an active inspection function than the provisional £100 allowance used in the earlier draft. The accounts do not, however, identify the individual journeys made during the year, so any detailed itinerary must be supported from correspondence, Gazette notices or newspaper reports rather than inferred from the expenditure alone.[4]
Personnel and the Limits of the Accounts
The Public Accounts group salaries by occupational category and do not identify the individual recipients. It is therefore safer to present the names below as personnel associated with the Defence Stores during the period, rather than as a salary establishment reconstructed from Vote 62.
Appointment
Personnel identified
Location or function
Inspector of Stores
Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Gorton
National inspection and oversight
Officer in charge, Auckland Store
Major William St Clair Tisdall
Auckland Defence Store
Officer in charge, Wellington Store
Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Elmhirst Reader
Wellington and Mount Cook stores
Armed Constabulary Storekeeper
Sam Cosgrave Anderson
Armed Constabulary storekeeping, Wellington
Clerk
John Blomfield
Auckland Defence Store
Clerk
John Price
Auckland Defence Store
Clerk
Alexander Crowe
Wellington Defence Store
Armourer
David Evitt, until his death on 23 February 1872; succeeded by his son, George Evitt
Auckland
Armourer
Edward Metcalf Smith
Wellington
Armourer
Edwin Henry Bradford
Wellington
Arms Cleaner
Thomas Gibbins
Auckland
Arms Cleaner
John Penligen
Auckland
Arms Cleaner
Charles Philips
Auckland
Arms Cleaner
William Cook Rockley
Auckland
Arms Cleaner
William Warren
Wellington
Arms Cleaner
John Shaw
Wellington
Arms Cleaner
James Smith
Wellington
Arms Cleaner
Walter Christie
Wellington
Magazine Keeper
John Broughton
Auckland
Magazine Keeper
William Corliss
Wellington
Sub-storekeepers and officers performing store duties
Names not yet fully identified
Wanganui, Patea and other district centres
This nominal roll should not be read as proof that every person served for the full twelve months or that each salary came from Vote 62. In particular, the Inspector’s establishment was separately accounted for, and Armed Constabulary appointments could be charged elsewhere. The named roll is useful for institutional history, while the aggregate Public Accounts provide the reliable financial totals.
Armourer succession at Auckland: David Evitt, a former British Military Stores Armourer and long-serving government gunsmith, remained responsible for Auckland’s arms until his death on 23 February 1872. Although seriously ill, he reportedly completed the repair of one final rifle shortly before his death. His son, George Evitt, succeeded him as Government Armourer and held the appointment until 1888.
Arms, Carbines and the Technical Workload
The 1872 Annual Report of the Inspector of Militia and Volunteers provides direct evidence of the condition of the weapons that the Store Department’s armourers and arms cleaners had to support. The Inspector reported that the breech-loading cavalry carbines were generally in a very bad state. Five hundred Snider carbines had been ordered from England, but had not arrived by the date of the report.
The Enfield rifles issued to infantry corps were, with few exceptions, in indifferent condition after prolonged use. Their barrel grooves were becoming worn and would deteriorate further until the weapons became unserviceable. The Inspector warned that British manufacture of Enfield rifles and ammunition was declining and that failure to replace the existing stock progressively could result in a very large future rearmament cost.
Targets were another supply problem. Imported targets had been ordered but had not arrived, while targets manufactured locally for immediate use had proved far inferior to those made in England. These observations show that the Defence Stores were supporting not merely an accounting system but also an ageing weapons inventory, delayed overseas procurement, and the uneven quality of colonial substitutes.[5]
Auckland Defence Store and Magazine Arrangements
The Auckland establishment continued under Major William St Clair Tisdall with John Blomfield and John Price as clerks, George Evitt as armourer, Thomas Gibbins, John Penligen, Charles Philips and William Cook Rockley as arms cleaners, and John Broughton as magazine keeper.
The movement away from the magazine arrangements at Albert Barracks and the development of the Mount Eden site were part of a broader effort to place powder storage on a safer, more controlled footing. The Regulations for Gunpowder Magazines issued in 1872 established formal rules for the custody, storage and handling of gunpowder. The uploaded financial and militia reports do not, by themselves, establish the precise completion date of the Mount Eden works, so the physical development of the site should continue to be sourced from the Gazette, tenders, and contemporary newspaper reports.
Wellington Defence Stores, Mount Cook
At Wellington, the Mount Cook Depot on Buckle Street remained the principal southern store. Existing research identifies Henry Elmhirst Reader as Storekeeper, Alexander Crowe as clerk, Edward Metcalf Smith and Edwin Henry Bradford as armourers, William Warren, John Shaw, James Smith and Walter Christie as arms cleaners, and William Corliss as magazine keeper. Anderson’s Armed Constabulary storekeeping duties were closely connected with this establishment, although the accounts do not demonstrate that his salary formed part of Vote 62.
The large aggregate expenditure on armourers and arms cleaners in 1871–72 confirms that technical weapon maintenance was not a peripheral activity, but the highest single cost within the Store Department vote.
Volunteers, Cadets and Continuing Demand
The 1872 report recorded 6,042 enrolled adult Volunteers at 31 March 1872, of whom 5,101 were classed as efficient. The North Island accounted for 4,038 enrolled and 3,584 efficient Volunteers, while the South Island had 2,004 enrolled and 1,517 efficient. A further 1,443 Cadets were enrolled, of whom 1,222 were efficient.
Force category
Enrolled
Efficient
Efficiency rate
North Island adult Volunteers
4,038
3,584
88%
South Island adult Volunteers
2,004
1,517
75%
All adult Volunteers
6,042
5,101
84%
Cadets
1,443
1,222
85%
The adult Volunteer total was lower than the 6,568 enrolled in the previous year, but it still represented a large and geographically dispersed body requiring rifles, carbines, ammunition, targets, accoutrements, repairs and accounting support. The Store Department had to sustain this demand with a central vote of only £2,607 2s. and a small network of permanent and part-time store personnel.[6]
Conclusion
The financial year from 1 July 1871 to 30 June 1872 was not a year of dramatic institutional change. It was a year in which colonial defence storekeeping became routine. The accounts show a compact Store Department that spent £2,607 2s., slightly below its authorised provision, while the separate Inspector’s Department spent £1,244 7s. 6d. and required supplementary authority for an £84 7s. 6d. excess.
The operational context was demanding. Cavalry carbines were in poor condition, Enfield rifles were wearing out, replacement Snider carbines and imported targets had not arrived, and locally made targets were unsatisfactory. At the same time, more than 6,000 adult Volunteers and 1,400 Cadets formed a dispersed customer base for arms, ammunition and equipment.
The department’s achievement lay in sustaining this system with limited resources. Storekeepers and clerks maintained custody and accounts; magazine keepers safeguarded ammunition; armourers and arms cleaners absorbed the largest share of departmental expenditure as they kept an ageing inventory serviceable. Rather than the provisional salary establishment of more than £3,400 suggested in the earlier draft, the confirmed record reveals a leaner organisation whose value rested in the technical and administrative work it performed across the colony.
[3] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1871-72, Commencing 1 July 1871 and ending 30 June 1872,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1873 Session I, B-01 (9 October 1873), https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1873-I.2.1.3.1.
[4] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1871-72, Commencing 1 July 1871 and ending 30 June 1872.”
[5] “Annual Report of the Inspector of Militia and Volunteers,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1872 Session I, G-14a ( 1872), .
[6] “Annual Report of the Inspector of Militia and Volunteers.”
The year from June 1870 to June 1871 was a formative period in the development of New Zealand’s Defence Stores system. By mid-1870, the withdrawal of Imperial forces from New Zealand was effectively complete, and with it ended the practical dominance of the British military storekeeping system that had supported Imperial operations in the colony. The responsibility for military stores, arms, ammunition, magazines, repairs, inspection, and accounting now rested with New Zealand’s own colonial defence administration.
This transition did not produce a large or elaborate organisation. The Defence Stores establishment remained small, dispersed, and heavily dependent on a limited number of experienced individuals. Yet it was now indispensable. The Armed Constabulary, Militia, and Volunteers all depended on arms, accoutrements, ammunition, magazines, repairs, and accountable issue systems. In this context, the Defence Stores were not merely warehouses. They were the technical and administrative mechanism that allowed New Zealand’s colonial forces to function.
Legislative and Financial Setting
The Militia Act 1870, passed on 12 September 1870, consolidated and amended the law relating to the Militia in New Zealand. It confirmed the Governor as Commander-in-Chief, provided for militia districts, battalions, and company divisions, and included provisions requiring arms and equipment to be returned when required. It also created penalties for losing, spoiling, selling, or pawning arms. These provisions are important because they show that the control of public arms was recognised as a matter of law, not simply routine administration.[1]
The financial setting was shaped by the Defence and other Purposes Loan Act 1870, which authorised the raising of £1,000,000, approximately NZ$180 million in 2026 values, for defence and other purposes. The Act allowed money to be borrowed in Great Britain or elsewhere and provided that the annual charge for interest and sinking fund was not to exceed six per cent.[2] A further Temporary Loan Act 1870 authorised the raising of up to £500,000, approximately NZ$90 million in 2026 values, in anticipation of monies to be raised under the larger loan legislation.[3]
Within this wider financial framework, the Store Department was provided for as a distinct defence function. The Appropriation Act 1870 funded an establishment that included an Inspector of Stores, clerks, storekeepers, sub-storekeepers, armourers, arms cleaners, magazine keepers, and operating expenses.[4]
For the modern equivalents used in this article, a working conversion of £1 in 1870 ≈ NZ$180 in 2026 values has been applied. The resulting figures are rounded and should be treated as indicative rather than exact.
Store Department Establishment, 1870–71
The following table places names against appointments where possible. Some identifications remain provisional, as the Appropriation Act lists positions and salaries rather than names. The named appointments have been drawn from the 1871 Civil Establishment nominal roll, the existing Defence Stores July 1870 to June 1871 article, the Auckland Defence Store article, and the compiled Defence Stores nominal roll.
Personnel Establishment
Appointment
Probable or confirmed incumbent, 1870–71
1870–71 amount
Approx. 2026 NZD
Inspector of Stores
Lieutenant-Colonel Edward Gorton
£500 0s. 0d.
$90,000
Clerk, Head Office
George Simpson Lockie
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
Storekeeper, Auckland
Major William St Clair Tisdall
£250 0s. 0d.
$45,000
Storekeeper, Wellington
Lieutenant-Colonel Henry Elmhirst Reader
£100 0s. 0d.
$18,000
Sub-storekeeper, Wanganui
Charles Chalklin
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
Two clerks, Auckland
John Blomfield and John Price
£320 0s. 0d.
$57,600
One clerk, Wellington
Alexander Crowe
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
Store Department clerk, Wellington
Sam Cosgrave Anderson
Not separately listed in this vote
Not separately calculated
Sub-storekeeper, Patea
C. A. Wray
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
Armourer, Auckland
David Evitt
£182 0s. 0d.
$32,760
Armourer, Wellington
Edward Metcalf Smith and Edwin Henry Bradford
£182 0s. 0d.
$32,760
Arms cleaners, Auckland
Thomas Gibbons, John Penligen, Charles Phillips, William Cook Rockley
£438 0s. 0d.
$78,840
Arms cleaners, Wellington
William Warren, John Shaw, James Smith, Walter Christie
£438 0s. 0d.
$78,840
Magazine keeper, Auckland
John Broughton
£83 10s. 0d.
$15,030
Magazine keeper, Wellington
William Corliss
£63 17s. 6d.
$11,498
Personnel establishment total
£3,317 7s. 6d.
$597,128
The appropriation and Public Accounts identify appointments and expenditure categories, but not always the individual recipients. Names have therefore been matched to appointments from nominal rolls, Gazette notices and related departmental research. Unless directly confirmed, the association should not be treated as proof that the individual drew the full annual amount from that vote.
Departmental Expenses
Expense
1870–71 amount
Approx. 2026 NZD
Notes
Rent, advertising, and contingencies
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
General operating costs of the Store Department.
Travelling expenses of inspecting officers
£90 0s. 0d.
$16,200
Supported inspection of stores, arms, and local establishments.
Departmental expenses total
£240 0s. 0d.
$43,200
Total Store Department Vote
Category
1870–71 amount
Approx. 2026 NZD
Personnel establishment
£3,317 7s. 6d.
$597,128
Departmental expenses
£240 0s. 0d.
$43,200
Total Store Department vote
£3,557 7s. 6d.
$640,328
This named establishment shows that the Store Department was more than a paper vote. By 1870–71, it included a recognisable network of storekeepers, clerks, armourers, arms cleaners, sub-storekeepers, and magazine keepers spread across Auckland, Wellington, Wanganui, and Patea. Separate from this personnel establishment were the department’s operating expenses, including rent, advertising, contingencies, and the travelling expenses of inspecting officers. Although modest, these expenses supported the inspection and accountability system that allowed the Defence Stores to supervise arms, ammunition, magazines, and equipment across several dispersed locations.
District Sub-storekeepers and the Dispersed Store System
In addition to the main stores at Wellington and Auckland, the Defence Stores system relied on a dispersed network of district sub-storekeepers. The existing return records district sub-storekeepers at Hamilton, Tauranga, Opotiki, Te Wairoa, Napier, Marton, Wanganui, Patea, New Plymouth, Blenheim, Nelson, Christchurch, Hokitika, Dunedin, and Invercargill. This demonstrates that the Store Department’s responsibilities extended well beyond the two principal depots. Arms, ammunition, camp equipment, tools, and accoutrements had to be held, issued, recovered, and accounted for across the colony.
The district sub-storekeeper role was often held alongside other duties. Often these appointments were combined with Militia Drill Instructor duties, Public Works sub-storekeeper duties, or Armed Constabulary sub-storekeeper responsibilities. This reflected both the small scale of the establishment and the practical need for local officials to serve multiple functions.
Public Accounts and Actual Store Department Expenditure
The Public Accounts for 1870–71 record actual Store Department expenditure of £3,458 17s. 3d., approximately NZ$622,598 in 2026 values. This was slightly below the authorised vote of £3,557 7s. 6d. The expenditure included salaries for the Inspector, storekeepers, and clerks, payments for armourers and arms cleaners, rent, advertising, contingencies, travelling expenses for inspecting officers, and the salaries of the Auckland and Wellington magazine keepers.[5]
This expenditure was modest when measured against the broader defence loans of the period, but it sustained the core mechanism of colonial military materiel management. The Store Department was responsible for ensuring that arms were maintained, ammunition was secured, stores were accounted for, and technical defects were identified and corrected.
Arms, Ammunition, Repairs, and Related Defence Expenditure
In addition to the Store Department establishment and operating expenses, the 1870–71 accounts record separate expenditure on arms, ammunition, repairs, targets, freight, insurance, and other defence-related costs. These were not listed as part of the Store Department personnel vote, but they directly affected the work of the Defence Stores, armourers, arms cleaners, and magazine keepers.
Under the Defence and other Purposes Loan Act 1870, the Government was authorised to apply loan funds to colonial defence expenditure. The First Schedule allowed up to £180,000 for colonial defence costs, charges, expenses, and liabilities for the year ending 30 June 1871, approximately NZ$32.4 million in 2026 values. A further £160,000, approximately NZ$28.8 million, was authorised for the year ending 30 June 1872.[6]
The Public Accounts for 1870–71 show that defence expenditure under Schedule I of the loan included the Armed Constabulary, miscellaneous defence expenditure, the steamer Luna, and Contingent Defence. Within those categories, several items related directly to the purchase, maintenance, carriage, and use of arms and ammunition.[7]
Arms, Ammunition, and Related Defence Costs, 1870–71
Item
1870–71 amount
Approx. 2026 NZD
Notes
Armed Constabulary, arms, ammunition, etc.
£563 15s. 3d.
$101,477
Arms and ammunition expenditure within Armed Constabulary contingent expenditure.
Purchase of arms
£948 19s. 6d.
$170,816
Listed under miscellaneous defence expenditure.
Purchase of ammunition
£593 6s. 6d.
$106,799
Listed separately from purchase of arms.
Repair of arms
£21 13s. 6d.
$3,902
Small but significant evidence of ongoing armourer work.
Targets
£61 1s. 6d.
$10,994
Supports rifle practice and prize firing.
Carriage and freight
£227 15s. 7d.
$41,000
Movement of arms, ammunition, targets, or associated stores.
Insurance
£150 0s. 0d.
$27,000
Likely associated with transport or storage risk.
Contingent Defence, ammunition and accoutrements
£4,697 19s. 0d.
$845,631
The largest directly identifiable arms, ammunition, and equipment-related item.
Total directly related to arms, ammunition, repairs, targets, freight, insurance, and accoutrements
£7,264 10s. 10d.
$1,307,618
The largest single item was £4,697 19s. for ammunition and accoutrements under Contingent Defence, approximately NZ$845,631 in 2026 values. This was significantly larger than the ordinary purchase of arms and ammunition listed under miscellaneous defence expenditure, suggesting that the most substantial equipment-related costs were associated with contingent or operational defence needs rather than routine store replacement.[8]
The accounts also recorded recoveries credited against colonial defence expenditure, including £98 10s. 5d. for arms and accoutrements and £344 1s. 11d. for ammunition. This was a combined recovery of £442 12s. 4d., approximately NZ$79,666 in 2026 values. These recoveries show that some costs were offset by repayments, returns, or credits, although the accounts do not provide enough detail to identify each transaction.[9]
This detailed expenditure adds an important dimension to the Defence Stores story. The Store Department’s own vote funded the people and machinery of storekeeping, but the broader defence accounts show the flow of materiel that those people had to receive, inspect, store, issue, repair, transport, and account for. Purchases of arms and ammunition, repairs of arms, provision of targets, carriage and freight, and the large contingent defence expenditure on ammunition and accoutrements all point to an active system of military supply rather than a dormant post-war storehouse.
Defence Stores Stock Holdings, August 1870
One of the most useful surviving snapshots of the Defence Stores system is the return of small arms, ordnance, ammunition, camp equipment, implements, and saddlery in military use as at 17 August 1870. This return gives scale to the Store Department’s task. It was not simply paying clerks and storekeepers. It was managing a large and mixed inventory of modern, obsolescent, and legacy weapons. The existing post cites this return as Edward Gorton’s report on the system of store accounts and returns of arms, ordnance, ammunition, and various stores.
Arms, Ordnance, and Ammunition in Store
Category
Item
Quantity
Small arms
Snider, all patterns
2,293
Small arms
Medium Hay Pattern rifles
7,726
Small arms
Enfield Pattern 1853 rifles
1,460
Small arms
Rifle, breech, Calisher & Terry
26
Small arms
Short Enfield sword rifles, Pattern 1853
33
Small arms
Spencer rifles
4
Small arms
Mont Storm rifles
5
Small arms
Percussion muskets, Pattern 1839
222
Small arms
Carbine, breech, Calisher & Terry
284
Small arms
Muzzle-loading Enfield artillery carbines
67
Small arms
Colt revolving carbines
4
Small arms
Percussion carbines, various types
12
Small arms
Revolvers, various types
215
Edged weapons
Cavalry swords
153
Ordnance
RBL 40-pounders
2
Ordnance
RBL 6-pounders
2
Ordnance
24-pounder howitzers
3
Ordnance
4.2/5-inch mortars
11
Ordnance
6-pounder carronade
1
Ordnance
3-pounder smooth bore gun
1
Small-arms ammunition
Snider rounds
470,228
Small-arms ammunition
Enfield rounds
1,804,983
Small-arms ammunition
Breech-loading carbine rounds
251,324
Small-arms ammunition
Revolver rounds
287,148
Small-arms ammunition
Percussion musket rounds
160,152
Ordnance ammunition
Cartridges
14,145
Ordnance ammunition
Shot and shell
22,806
The in-store holdings alone show the complexity of the Defence Stores task. The department held modern Snider rifles alongside large numbers of older Enfield and Medium Hay Pattern rifles, specialist carbines, revolvers, swords, artillery pieces, mortars, and large quantities of ammunition. This mixture of current, ageing, and specialist equipment required careful accounting and technical oversight.
Arms and Ordnance on Issue
Category
Item
Quantity
Small arms
Snider, all patterns
208
Small arms
Medium Hay Pattern rifles
9,263
Small arms
Enfield Pattern 1853 rifles
6,473
Small arms
Rifle, breech, Calisher & Terry
7
Small arms
Short Enfield sword rifles, Pattern 1853
224
Small arms
Spencer rifles
4
Small arms
Percussion muskets, Pattern 1839
1,007
Small arms
Breech-loading carbines
1,271
Small arms
Muzzle-loading Enfield artillery carbines
218
Small arms
Colt revolving carbines
2
Small arms
Percussion carbines, various types
267
Small arms
Revolvers, various types
934
Edged weapons
Cavalry swords
903
Ordnance
RBL 12-pounders
6
Ordnance
RBL 6-pounders
4
Ordnance
6-pounder brass gun
1
Ordnance
24-pounder howitzers
7
Ordnance
32-pounder iron guns
3
Ordnance
24-pounder iron guns
8
Ordnance
12-pounder iron guns
5
The quantities on issue are particularly important. They show that the principal challenge was not simply holding stores in depots, but accounting for thousands of weapons already dispersed to colonial forces. More than 9,000 Medium Hay Pattern rifles, 6,400 Enfields, 1,200 breech-loading carbines, 900 revolvers, and 900 cavalry swords were already away from the main stores and in the hands of units, posts, or local authorities.
Camp Equipment, Implements, and Saddlery
The August 1870 return also recorded camp equipment, implements, and saddlery. This broadens the understanding of the Defence Stores beyond arms and ammunition. The department also held the equipment needed for colonial forces to camp, dig, build, move, and sustain themselves in the field.
Camp Equipment, Implements, and Saddlery in Store
Item
Quantity
Circular tents
326
Indian tents
30
Field officer marquees
13
Waterproof sheets
523
Blankets
647
Felling axes
166
Pick axes
1,036
Fern hooks
115
Bill hooks
91
Spades
1,298
Shovels
1,214
Wheelbarrows
413
Mattocks
111
Cross-cut saws
41
Riding saddles
285
Bridles
262
Pack saddles
101
Camp Equipment, Implements, and Saddlery on Issue
Item
Quantity
Circular tents
130
Indian tents
14
Waterproof sheets
58
Blankets
275
Felling axes
235
Pick axes
239
Fern hooks
90
Bill hooks
35
Spades
400
Shovels
291
Wheelbarrows
85
Mattocks
18
Cross-cut saws
14
Riding saddles
48
Bridles
48
Pack saddles
47
This material shows that the Defence Stores had a broader field support role. It managed not only weapons and ammunition but also tents, blankets, tools, saddlery, and pack equipment. These were the practical stores required to support movement, field works, camps, mounted activity, and local defence operations.
Gorton’s Inspection Circuit
The travelling expenses provided in the Store Department vote were not theoretical. During the year, Inspector of Stores Edward Gorton inspected Auckland in July 1870, Wanganui and Napier in August, Wanganui and Auckland in December, Christchurch in April 1871, Dunedin in May, and Auckland, Tauranga, and Thames in June. This inspection circuit demonstrates how the Store Department attempted to impose accountability across a dispersed system of depots, district stores, magazines, and issued arms.
These inspections are significant because they connect the financial vote to actual departmental activity. The Store Department was not sitting passively in Wellington and Auckland. It was inspecting, checking, and attempting to control stores across the colony.
The Albert Barracks Powder Magazine and the Move to Mount Eden
The management of powder was one of the most sensitive Defence Stores responsibilities. In February 1871, Auckland newspapers reported public concern about the powder magazine at Albert Barracks, including rumours of an attempt to ignite it and criticism that entry controls had relaxed since the departure of the British garrison. There was also concern that the quantity of powder held in the magazine exceeded what was recorded in official documents. Given the magazine’s position in a densely populated part of Auckland, this raised fears of a catastrophic explosion.
By March 1871, it was announced that the powder magazine would be transferred from Albert Barracks to Mount Eden, and by May tenders were being sought for construction of the new magazine. This episode is important because it shows that the Defence Stores’ responsibilities were not confined to accounting and issue. They included the safe custody of explosive stores, the accuracy of ammunition records, and the siting of magazines in relation to public safety.
Armourers, Arms Cleaners, and the Control of Rifles
During inspections conducted by armourers, unauthorised alterations to rifle backsights were identified, leading Lieutenant-Colonel Gorton in November 1870 to direct that altered rifles be returned to store. This incident is worth retaining and expanding, because it shows the Defence Stores acting as a technical authority, not simply as a storage office.
The issue was significant. In a militia and volunteer system, arms were widely distributed across local corps and districts. Without regular inspection, rifles could be modified, neglected, damaged, or retained without proper accountability. The presence of armourers at Auckland and Wellington, supported by arms cleaners at both centres, reflects the practical requirement to keep colonial weapons safe, serviceable, and standardised.
The wider history of New Zealand military armourers reinforces this point. Between the 1860s and 1900, New Zealand’s military armourers evolved from civilian gunsmiths and part-time artificers into a more professional group whose technical skills underpinned the readiness of the colony’s forces. The 1870–71 rifle-sight incident therefore illustrates a broader pattern: technical control of arms was becoming an essential part of colonial defence administration.
Edward Metcalf Smith and Iron-sand Experiments
Edward Metcalf Smith adds a useful technical dimension to the Defence Stores story. Smith had accumulated experience in the iron industry before undertaking a gunsmith apprenticeship at the Royal Small Arms factories in London and Enfield, followed by service at the Royal Arsenal, Woolwich. Arriving in New Zealand in 1861 as Garrison Armourer, he later served as armourer for the Taranaki Militia and Taranaki Rifle Volunteers.
By 1871, Smith had relocated to Wellington as Defence Armourer. Drawing on the resources of the armourers’ shop, he continued experimenting with Taranaki iron sand and refining his smelting process. His presence shows that the Defence Stores workshops were not merely places for routine cleaning and repair. They were also centres of practical technical knowledge, where experienced tradesmen applied workshop skills to broader colonial industrial problems.
Auckland Defence Store
The Auckland Defence Store remained one of the most important sites in the colonial storekeeping network. Auckland had been the main centre of Imperial and colonial military activity during much of the New Zealand Wars, and its storekeeping arrangements evolved from earlier Colonial Store and Militia Store systems. By 1870–71, the Auckland establishment included Major William St Clair Tisdall as Storekeeper, John Blomfield and John Price as clerks, George Evitt as armourer, Thomas Gibbins, John Penligen, Charles Philips, and William Cook Rockley as arms cleaners, and John Broughton as magazine keeper.
The later development of Auckland’s ordnance estate, including the movement of magazines to Mount Eden and the creation of more purpose-built facilities, shows that the improvised arrangements of the early 1870s were only the beginning of a longer process. New Zealand inherited a patchwork of armouries, magazines, depots, and barracks after Imperial withdrawal, and the gradual shift toward purpose-built logistics infrastructure began from this point.
Wellington Defence Stores, Mount Cook
At Wellington, the Defence Stores were centred on the Mount Cook Depot at Buckle Street. The named personnel for 1870–71 included Henry Elmhirst Reader as Storekeeper, Alexander Crowe as clerk, Edward Metcalf Smith and Edwin Henry Bradford as armourers, William Warren, John Shaw, James Smith, and Walter Christie as arms cleaners, and William Corliss as magazine keeper.
Mount Cook had previously been associated with Imperial military use, but by 1870–71 it was firmly part of the colonial defence system. Its use as a store, magazine, workshop, and later ordnance site connects the immediate post-Imperial Defence Stores establishment with the much longer history of Buckle Street as a centre of New Zealand military logistics.
The Joint Committee on Colonial Defence
In 1871, the Joint Committee on Colonial Defence examined both external and internal defence. For external defence, the committee considered the risk of sudden attack by a small cruiser or privateer against New Zealand’s harbours, but judged that the cost of large harbour defence works was too great for the time being. For internal defence, it identified the Armed Constabulary, Militia, and Volunteers as the available means of defence.[10]
Most importantly for this article, the committee recommended a reorganisation of the General Staff that included a Lieutenant-Colonel, Quartermaster-General and Colonial Storekeeper. This recommendation placed storekeeping and supply functions at the level of senior defence administration, alongside the Adjutant-General, Paymaster-General, and Inspecting Field Officer.
Although these were only recommendations, it shows that contemporaries understood the importance of stores, equipment, accounting, and supply to the effective management of colonial defence.
Armed Constabulary Readiness and Local Resources
The Armed Constabulary remained one of the main users of Defence Stores. In March 1871, the Defence Minister issued a circular to officers commanding Armed Constabulary posts, stressing that the efficiency of the standing force had to compensate for its numerical inferiority. Officers were instructed to know the country around their posts, including roads, tracks, streams, settlers, food, horses, and stores available in an emergency.[11]
This circular adds useful context to the Defence Stores story. Defence readiness was not simply a matter of men under arms. It required local knowledge, mobility, stores, transport, food, horses, ammunition, and serviceable weapons. The Defence Stores provided the materiel foundation for that system, while local officers were expected to understand how to use available resources in an emergency.
Volunteers and the Demand for Arms
The Inspector of Militia and Volunteers reported that Volunteer strength increased from 5,407 in June 1870 to 6,568 by 31 March 1871, with the number qualifying for capitation also increasing. He attributed this growth partly to increased capitation allowances and legislative encouragement.[12]
This increase placed additional pressure on the Defence Stores. More Volunteers meant more rifles, accoutrements, ammunition, inspections, repairs, accounting, and recoveries. The Store Department’s small establishment therefore supported a growing citizen-force system at the same time as New Zealand was reducing its reliance on Imperial troops.
Harbour Defence and the Limits of Resources
Papers relating to the defence of New Zealand harbours show that the Government was concerned about the risk of attack by small but heavily armed cruisers. In March 1871, Captain Hutton was asked to report on Auckland harbour defence, taking into account economy, efficiency, batteries, ordnance, and even torpedoes.[13]
This issue connects directly to the Defence Stores. Harbour defence, whether implemented immediately or deferred, required guns, carriages, ammunition, tools, storage, trained detachments, magazines, and repair capacity. Even where major expenditure was postponed, the debate reinforced the need for a reliable colonial store system capable of supporting whatever defence policy was adopted.
Conclusion
The period from June 1870 to June 1871 was a year of consolidation for New Zealand’s Defence Stores. With Imperial forces gone, New Zealand had to maintain its own arms, ammunition, stores, magazines, workshops, buildings, and accounting systems. The Store Department’s authorised vote of £3,557 7s. 6d., approximately NZ$640,328 in 2026 values, was modest, but it supported a small network of personnel whose work underpinned the readiness of the Armed Constabulary, Militia, and Volunteers.
When the wider defence accounts are included, the importance of the Defence Stores becomes even clearer. Its personnel establishment of just over £3,300 supported the management of arms, ammunition, repairs, freight, targets, magazines, and accoutrements valued at many thousands of pounds more, including over £7,200, approximately NZ$1.3 million in 2026 values, in directly identifiable arms, ammunition, repair, target, freight, insurance, and accoutrement-related expenditure during 1870–71.
The year also reveals the human foundations of the Defence Stores system. Edward Gorton provided inspection and oversight. Henry Elmhirst Reader and William St Clair Tisdall managed key store locations. Sam Cosgrave Anderson gained the experience that would later make him Defence Storekeeper. Edwin Henry Bradford, Edward Metcalf Smith, George Evitt, and Walter Christie represented the technical trades that kept weapons serviceable, while magazine keepers such as William Corliss and John Broughton provided custody of ammunition and powder.
This was not yet the New Zealand Army Ordnance Corps, but it was one of its direct administrative and technical ancestors. The Store Department inherited much from the Imperial system, including its stores, practices, responsibilities, and problems, but it also began adapting them to colonial needs. In this sense, 1870–71 was more than a quiet administrative year after the departure of Imperial troops. It marked the point at which New Zealand’s own defence storekeeping system became essential to the colony’s military independence..
[5] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1870-71, Commencing 1 July 1870 and ending 30 June 1874,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1872 Session I, B-01 (9 October 1872), https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1872-I.2.1.3.1.
[6] Zealand, Defence and other Purposes Loan Act 1870 (33 and 34 Victoriae 1870 No 81).
[7] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1870-71, Commencing 1 July 1870 and ending 30 June 1874.”
[8] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1870-71, Commencing 1 July 1870 and ending 30 June 1874.”
[9] “Public Accounts of the General Government of New Zealand, for the Financial Year 1870-71, Commencing 1 July 1870 and ending 30 June 1874.”
[10] “Report by the Committees of the Legislative Council and House of Representatives, sitting in Conference, on the Defence of the Colony,” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives 1871 Session I, H-09 (9 October 1871), https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1871-I.2.2.5.12.
