Built for Purpose

2 Comments

From Barracks Scraps to Purpose-Built Hubs: 150+ Years of Building the Army’s Logistic Backbone

New warehouses and workshops at Linton and Burnham, together with modernised ammunition facilities at Waiouru and Glentunnel, might appear to be a sudden leap forward. In truth, they are the culmination of more than a century of steady, often unsung work to give the New Zealand Army the purpose-built logistics estate it has long needed. What began with repurposed barracks and rented sheds has matured, through wars, reorganisations, and the inevitable missteps, into integrated hubs designed from the ground up to equip the force.

This is a story of continuity as much as change. From early Defence Stores and mobilisation depots in the main centres, through the wartime booms of 1914–18 and 1939–45, logisticians learned to move faster, store safer, and repair smarter, usually in buildings never meant for the job. Sites such as Buckle Street, Mount Eden, Trentham, Hopuhopu, Dunedin, and later Linton and Burnham mark a long arc: improvisation giving way to planning; planning giving way to design.

The latest builds finally align doctrine, funding, and design. The shift to an “equip-the-force” model only works when receipt, storage, maintenance, and distribution are physically co-located and engineered to modern standards. Regional Supply Facilities (RSFs) centralise holdings with safer, climate-controlled storage and efficient yard flows; Maintenance Support Facilities (MSFs) bring high-bay capacity, test equipment, and compliance under one roof; and ammunition nodes at Waiouru and Glentunnel provide the segregation and environmental control that contemporary explosive safety demands.

Just as important is what this means for soldiers and readiness. Purpose-built hubs shorten turnaround times, reduce double-handling, and lift safety for people and materiel. They replace the “temporary” fixes that became permanent, the dispersed footprints that drained time, and the old shells that forced workarounds. In their place stands an estate that is faster to mobilise, easier to sustain, and cheaper to maintain over its life.

Recent decisions, embodied in the Defence Capability Plan 2025 and Cabinet approval for the Burnham RSF, lock in this direction. They don’t erase the past; they complete it. The spades now in the ground are finishing a project begun when New Zealand first took charge of its own stores: building a logistics backbone worthy of the force it supports.

Imperial inheritance to early New Zealand builds (1870s–1900s)

When Imperial forces departed New Zealand in 1870, New Zealand inherited more than uniforms and drill; it inherited a patchwork estate of armouries, magazines, depots and barracks.

In Wellington, the Mount Cook complex, long used by Imperial regiments and the Military Stores, passed to colonial control in 1869–70 and was promptly repurposed for colonial defence. Through the 1880s the site was expanded with new brick storehouses, sheds and workshops along the Buckle Street frontage and up the Mount Cook terraces, improving dry storage, accounting space and light-repair capacity.[1] At the same time, explosives handling was progressively decanted from the congested Mount Cook Powder Magazine to the purpose-built Kaiwharawhara Powder Magazines in 1879, providing safer segregation from central Wellington and better access to rail and wharf.[2]

Plan of Mount Cook Barracks, as planned c.1845 and largely as built by 1852.

In Auckland, as the Albert Barracks precinct shrank, munitions storage shifted to the Mount Eden magazine reserve with magazines erected from 1871.[3] A new, purpose-built Defence Store was then constructed in O’Rourke Street to handle general stores and light repair. In 1903, the store, along with an armourer’s shop, was re-established at Mount Eden, consolidating the city’s ordnance functions on the magazine site.[4] Functionally, these early builds privileged secure explosives segregation and dry, ventilated bulk storage, with on-site light repair and armouring capacity, modest in scale but a decisive break from improvised sheds and hired warehouses, and a sign that New Zealand was beginning to design for its own needs rather than simply “making do” with imperial leftovers.

Plan of the O’Rourke Street Defence Store

Operationally, the South African War exposed mobilisation friction, slow issue, scattered holdings, and too many ad hoc premises. A Joint Defence Committee in 1900 pushed for dedicated Mobilisation Stores in each main centre, so the Crown began stitching a national pattern from local threads.[5] The results arrived in quick succession: a large drill/mobilisation hall at King Edward Barracks, Christchurch (1905); a mobilisation store in St Andrew’s Street, Dunedin (1907); and, in Wellington, the new Defence Stores/Mobilisation accommodation at Buckle Street (opened 1911), while Auckland’s needs were met mainly through upgrades at Mount Eden rather than a wholly new urban depot. Individually modest, collectively these works created a basic four-centre network positioned for speed of receipt and issue, with cleaner lines of accountability between the Defence Stores Department (est. 1862) and the emerging territorial/volunteer force.

Dunedin Mobilisation Stores, 211 St Andrews Street, Dunedin. Google Maps/ Public Domain
Defence Stores, Bunny Street, Wellington. Goggle Maps/Public Domain

Design language also began to standardise. Plans specified raised timber floors and generous roof ventilation to protect stores; fire-resistant construction (brick where urban fire risk warranted); covered loading and cart docks; and simple armourer’s benches with bench-power where available. None of this was glamorous, but it shortened the last tactical mile: fewer handlings, quicker turns, and fewer losses to damp or vermin. Above all, it signalled a mental shift, from occupying Imperial real estate to building a New Zealand logistics architecture that could be multiplied, upgraded and, in time, militarised for war. Those decisions in the 1870s–1900s laid the rails (figuratively and, in some centres, quite literally nearby) for the vast expansions of 1914–19 and again in 1939–45.

WWI expansion and interwar consolidation

WWI swelled requirements across every line of supply. Buckle Street in Wellington was extended, and additional inner-city warehouses were leased to keep pace with kit flowing in and out of mobilising units. After 1918, a series of ordnance reforms (1917–20) set about turning wartime improvisation into a planned peacetime estate.

In Auckland, the cramped Mount Eden magazine reserve and scattered inner-city premises were superseded by a purpose-built Northern Ordnance Depot at Hopuhopu. The decision to move was taken early in the decade; transfers from Mount Eden began in 1927, with the new depot formally opened in 1929. [6]As part of the transition, the 1903 Mount Eden stores building was dismantled and re-erected at Narrow Neck on the North Shore, an elegant example of salvaging useful fabric while shifting the centre of gravity south.

Hopuhopu represented a conscious leap from piecemeal sheds to an integrated regional hub designed for mobilisation scale. Sited just north of Ngāruawāhia, the depot sat adjacent to the North Island Main Trunk railway and on the Waikato River, with plans for a quarter-mile detraining platform and a spur running half a mile into camp so that stores could be received and dispatched with minimal handling. The original scheme envisaged multiple large warehouses aligned to the rail; what opened first was a substantial 100 × 322-ft building, with additional storage added later. Ammunition infrastructure was integral from the outset: ten reinforced hillside magazines with double walls and inspection chambers for temperature control, protective blast pyramids between magazines, and a laboratory, an engineered answer to the limitations of Mount Eden’s nineteenth-century magazines. Contemporary reporting cast Hopuhopu as the Dominion’s chief military magazine and “probably the greatest ordnance depot.”[7] Underlining the strategic intent behind the site choice: rail access, training space, and safe separation from the city while remaining close enough to Auckland’s labour and industrial base. In short, exactly what the interwar Army had lacked, a scalable, rail-served, purpose-sited depot that could receive, hold and issue mobilisation stocks for the entire northern region.

1961 Hopuhopu Military Camp from the air. Whites Aviation Ltd: Photographs. Ref: WA-55339-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22480584

In Wellington, explosives storage was deliberately removed from the urban core. Defence use of the Kaiwharawhara Powder Magazines was transferred in 1920 to the more isolated Fort Ballance Magazine Area on the Miramar Peninsula, where the New Zealand Army Ordnance Corps (NZAOC) Ammunition Section operated a mix of purpose-built magazines and re-purposed gun pits across the Miramar Peninsula. Buckle Street initially remained the administrative and general stores centre; however, in 1920 the bulk stores and accounting functions were transferred to the expanding depot at Trentham.[8] In 1930, the workshops followed, consolidating ordnance administration, storage, and maintenance on the Trentham estate.[9] Fort Ballance thus became the ammunition node, segregating high-risk functions from the city, while Trentham emerged as the principal National logistics hub.

Trentham – 1941.Upper Hutt City Library (5th Mar 2018). Trentham Camp 1938-1943 (approximate). In Website Upper Hutt City Library. Retrieved 10th Oct 2020 15:28, from https://uhcl.recollect.co.nz/nodes/view/25874

In the South Island, the Dunedin Mobilisation Store/Ordnance Depot at 211 St Andrew’s Street, already constrained by its central-city site and ageing fabric, was progressively wound down after the First World War. The depot had even weathered a significant fire on 12 June 1917, which underscored both the risks of dense, multi-storey warehousing and the limits of the building itself.[10] Operations continued, but the case for a purpose-sited regional depot hardened. In 1920–21, as the southern military districts were combined into a Southern Military Command, Defence took over the former Burnham Industrial School and established a single Southern Command Ordnance Depot there, absorbing Dunedin’s people, records, and holdings (and Christchurch’s store at King Edward Barracks).[11] Early capital went into shelving and quickly erecting additional buildings, including relocated structures from Featherston and Lyttelton, to stand up the depot at pace. Concentrating stocks at Burnham rationalised rail and road movements across the island, simplified accounting and inspection, and, critically, placed the depot alongside the South Island’s principal training and mobilisation camp, creating the integrated logistics hub that Dunedin’s city site could never be.

Taken together, these reforms converted a wartime patchwork into a rationalised interwar network: a rail-served Northern Ordnance Depot at Hopuhopu; a consolidated Southern Command Ordnance Depot at Burnham; and, in the capital, a split-function arrangement with Trentham taking over administration, bulk stores and workshops while Fort Ballance provided the segregated ammunition area. Each node was purpose-sited, safety-compliant, and, crucially, scaled for regional mobilisation and routine sustainment.

WWII to Cold War: a larger, more technical estate

The Second World War triggered a nationwide building surge: new depots, sub-depots and ammunition areas were thrown up to handle an unprecedented volume of people and materiel. Crucially, the established hubs at Hopuhopu, Trentham and Burnham were not merely expanded, they underwent comprehensive upgrade programmes with new warehouses and improved materials-handling layouts, layered on top of the broader wartime construction effort. In parallel, Linton grew rapidly from a wartime bulk store into a permanent logistics location. Across the main camps, widespread leasing, alterations, and the build-out of supply depots and M.T. workshops kept pace with demand and modernised the estate.[12]

Main Ordnance Depot, Trentham Camp – 1946
Burnham-1942

By 1944, the ammunition estate had been transformed. What began as a modest pre-war holding at Fort Ballance and Hopuhopu became a fully engineered national network, with hundreds of magazines dispersed for safety, climate control and throughput, so that, for the first time, virtually all stocks could be kept under cover and managed to consistent standards.

Makomako Ammunition Area C1945. Public Works Department

The technical load expanded just as quickly. Ordnance Workshops moved beyond routine repairs into complex systems: artillery, searchlights, wireless and radar, along with the precision test equipment and spares those capabilities required. Workshop teams supervised coast-defence installations and fitted intricate fire-control instruments, high-tolerance work delivered despite shortages of publications and trained staff.

In 1945 New Zealand assumed control of Sylvia Park from the departing U.S. forces, folding a major Auckland ordnance area into the national system. The following year, Mangaroa, transferred from the RNZAF, added substantial storage capacity to the Trentham logistics cluster. By 1946, the post-war footprint was essentially set: NZAOC depots and NZEME workshops at Hopuhopu, Linton, Trentham, and Burnham, supported by a dispersed ammunition network and stores sub-depots at Waiouru, Sylvia Park (Auckland), and Mangaroa (Wellington district). The geography reflected hard-won lessons: keep heavy repair close to railheads and major camps; site explosives in segregated, engineered locations; and disperse risk while preserving rapid access.

In short, the war years forced a step-change in scale, safety and technology, and, by 1945–46, had fixed the estate’s Cold War foundations: integrated depots and workshops at the four principal hubs, sustained by a dispersed, engineered ammunition backbone capable of mobilising quickly and sustaining forces at home and abroad.

Linton, Trentham, and Burnham ,  parallel arcs (1915–1990s)

Linton: growth, setbacks, recovery ,  expanded

Linton’s logistics story is one of endurance and incremental wins. A First World War–era presence (with a Palmerston North district store and later wartime sub-depots) matured into a permanent depot from 1 October 1946, when the wartime Bulk Sub-Depot was re-established as the district’s ordnance centre. From the outset, however, demand outpaced the estate. Temporary sheds remained in place well beyond their intended lifespan; a serious fire on 31 December 1944 had already highlighted the fragility of inherited buildings.[13] Another fire in 1953 reinforced the risks posed by thinly resourced infrastructure.

The 1950s brought both growth and compromise. New warehouses (CB26/CB27) went up on Dittmer Road in 1949–50, but space was still tight. In 1957 the Central Districts Vehicle Depot shifted from Trentham to Linton, bringing prefabricated buildings from Fort Dorset (CB14–CB17) as stopgaps. A 1958 site study proposed a 125,000-sq-ft integrated depot and “logistic precinct”, but full funding never landed; instead, piecemeal extensions and relocations kept the wheels turning. The standing warning applied: “temporary” infrastructure has a habit of becoming permanent, each hut retained added compliance risk, maintenance burden and inefficiency, and locked in sub-optimal layouts that would cost more to fix later.[14]

Central Districts Ordnance Depot, Linton Camp 1958

There were bright spots. A new headquarters (CB18) opened in 1961, followed by a dedicated clothing store (CB4) in 1963. Most significantly, a new workshop completed in 1967 delivered a long-overdue lift in capacity, safety and workflow, though the surrounding warehouses and yards still betrayed the site’s improvised origins. In 1968, a 45,000 sq ft (4,181 m²) extension to the clothing store (CB4) was planned; budget cuts reduced this to 25,000 sq ft (2,323 m²). Built by 2 Construction Squadron, RNZE from 1969, the extension was completed on 7 November 1972 at a reported cost of $143,000 and 43,298 man-hours; the building now hosts 5 Movements Company, RNZALR.

2COD/2 Supply warehouse, Linton Camp

A purpose-built ration store (1990/91) replaced the old railhead site, and in 1992 the Ready Reaction Force Ordnance Support Group transferred from Burnham to Linton, concentrating readiness support alongside district supply. Yet the underlying picture remained mixed, WWII-era shells, prefabs and undersized sheds persisted, forcing logisticians to work around the estate rather than with it.

Those constraints explain the emphasis of later programmes (from the 1990s onward): replacing legacy fabric and dispersion with genuinely purpose-built supply and maintenance infrastructure. In that sense, today’s RSF/MSF era at Linton isn’t a break with the past, it is the long-deferred completion of what logisticians on the Manawatū plain have been building towards for nearly a century.

Trentham: the main depot modernises

As the Army’s principal depot for most of the twentieth century, Trentham evolved from a spread of older camp buildings into a more integrated complex. The Second World War surge added huts, sheds and workshops at pace, supplementing, but not replacing, First World War–era stock.[15] In 1945, a tranche of wartime buildings from the Hutt Valley was relocated onto Trentham, effectively locking in the depot’s footprint and circulation patterns for the next forty years.

Trentham 2020

Modernisation accelerated in the 1980s with computerised accounting, improved materials-handling flows, and expanded trade-training roles. Crucially, Trentham gained a purpose-built warehouse complex, and a new workshop building (1988) lifted maintenance, inspection and storage to contemporary standards, finally reducing reliance on ageing wartime shells.

The RNZAOC Award-winning warehouse at Trentham was constructed for $1.6 million in 1988. In addition to the high-rise pallet racking for bulk stores, a vertical storage carousel capable of holding 12,000 detail items was installed later.

However, as Trentham continued to modernise in the 1990s, much of the benefit to the Army was eroded by commercialisation. Warehousing and maintenance functions were progressively outsourced, with associated infrastructure handed over to commercial contractors under service arrangements. In practice, uniformed logistics trades at Trentham shifted from hands-on depot and workshop work to contract management and assurance, narrowing organic depth and placing greater reliance on service-level agreements, while only a core of deployable capability was retained in-house.

Burnham: consolidation and steady improvement

Following interwar consolidation, Burnham served as the South Island’s ordnance hub. The Second World War drove a major build-out on the camp: new bulk warehouses and transit sheds, extended loading banks and hardstand, additional vehicle/MT repair bays, and a suite of magazine buildings and ammunition-handling spaces to support mobilisation and training. A regional ammunition footprint in Canterbury (including the Glentunnel area) complemented Burnham’s general stores, giving the South Island a coherent stores-and-munitions arrangement anchored on the camp.[16]

The post-war decades, however, saw only limited capital development. Rationalisation pulled dispersed holdings back onto Burnham and replaced the worst of the wartime huts, but most improvements were incremental, better racking and materials-handling, selective reroofing and insulation, and small workshop upgrades rather than wholesale rebuilds. By the 1970s–90s, Burnham’s layout and building stock reflected that long, steady consolidation: fewer, better-sited stores, improved access to rail and road, and workshops lifted just enough to service heavier, more technical fleets. The result was a functional, if ageing, platform, one that sustained the South Island through the Cold War and set the stage for later purpose-built facilities under the RSF/MSF era.

Hopuhopu & Sylvia Park (Northern area): closure (1989)

As part of late–Cold War rationalisation, the Northern Ordnance Depot at Hopuhopu and its Auckland sub-depot at Sylvia Park were closed in 1989, with residual holdings and functions redistributed across the national network.

Ammunition infrastructure modernisation

The Second World War left New Zealand with a highly dispersed land-ammunition estate. By 1945, magazines and preparation points dotted all three military districts: in the Northern area at Ardmore, Kelms Road and Hopuhopu; in the Central area at Waiouru, Makomako, Belmont and Kuku Valley; and in the Southern area at Alexandra, Burnham, Glentunnel, Fairlie and Mt Somers.[17] That distribution made sense for wartime surge and local defence, but it was costly to maintain in peacetime and increasingly out of step with modern safety and environmental standards.

From the 1950s through the late Cold War, most of the WWII-era peripheral sites were either decommissioned or repurposed, with holdings progressively concentrated into a smaller number of engineered locations. Wellington’s Belmont area, for example, carried unique post-war burdens, including custody of New Zealand’s chemical munitions, before the ammunition function in the capital consolidated elsewhere and the site ceased to be part of the active Army network.  By the 2000s, the Army’s land-ammunition storage posture was anchored on two purpose-sited hubs: Waiouru in the central North Island and the Southern Ammunition Node centred on Glentunnel in Canterbury.

Waiouru was rebuilt in staged programmes (Stage 1 in 2005, Stage 2 in 2014) to deliver earth-covered buildings, improved separation distances, environmental controls and safer flows for receipt, storage, conditioning and issue.[18]  [19]

https://www.spantech.co.nz/projects/waiouru-explosive-ordnance-depot-stage-1

In the South Island, the Southern Ammunition Node project (2021) upgraded explosive-store buildings and handling infrastructure to a common modern standard sized to support a year of training demand on the island, bringing a previously scattered Canterbury footprint (with Glentunnel as the core) into a coherent, compliant node. [20]

https://www.spantech.co.nz/projects/nz-defence-southern-ammunition-node-project

The result is a network that is smaller, safer and faster: fewer, but better, magazine areas with consistent climatic performance, modern explosive safety distances, and integrated preparation buildings that reduce handling risk and turn-times. Consolidation also simplifies inspection, surveillance and remediation, and aligns the ammunition estate with the RSF/MSF programme so storage, maintenance and distribution can be planned as one system rather than as a set of isolated sites.

The twenty-first-century shift: Equip the Force

Policy has now caught up with practice. The Consolidated Logistics Project (CLP) completes the move from “equip the unit” to “equip the force”, funding new, centralised infrastructure: an RSF at Burnham and a regional vehicle storage facility at Linton, among other builds. Cabinet has authorised the construction of the Burnham RSF, with a capital envelope of $82.7 m, and programme documents set out the CLP’s multi-site scope. Market notices show Linton-based CLP stages (RSF/RVSF) flowing through the procurement pipeline.[21]

Linton MSF (opened 2023)

A purpose-built, high-bay engineering complex that replaced the main Linton workshop, constructed in 1967, along with the patchwork of mid-century annexes and portacabin add-ons. The facility consolidates maintenance under one roof with full-height, drive-through heavy bays, overhead gantry cranes, a rolling-road/brake test lane, lifts, segregated clean/dirty workstreams, and an on-site test range for function checks. Sized for LAV and Bushmaster fleets and configured for the wider B- and C-vehicle park—from trucks and plant to engineer equipment—it also accommodates weapons, communications, and specialist systems. Designed around a diagnostics-led workflow, with adjacent tool cribs, parts kitting, and secure technical stores, it improves safety and throughput via controlled pedestrian routes, tail-gate docks, and compliant wash-down and waste systems. With environmental safeguards, provision for future power/ICT growth, and co-location within the logistic precinct, the Linton MSF shortens pull-through from supply to fit-line to road test, lifting quality assurance and return-to-service times.[22]

Linton MSF 2023. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=750344223796275&set=pcb.750344483796249

Burnham MSF (construction underway)

Sod-turned in 2023, this purpose-built maintenance complex replaces WWII-era workshops and the later patchwork of add-ons, lifting the South Island’s ability to repair and regenerate fleets to modern standards. Bringing heavy and light bays under one roof, the design provides full-height access with overhead lifting, drive-through servicing and inspection lanes, a diagnostics-led workflow with adjacent tool cribs and secure technical stores, and clearly separated clean electronics/COMMS and weapons workrooms from “dirty” vehicle and plant tasks. Compliant wash-down, waste and hazardous-stores arrangements, controlled vehicle/pedestrian flows, and modern QA points improve safety and throughput, while environmental and seismic resilience, upgraded power and ICT, and growth headroom future-proof the site. Co-located with the Burnham Regional Supply Facility, the MSF shortens pull-through from spares to fit-line to road test and builds in surge capacity for exercises, operations and civil-defence tasks—delivering a step-change from disparate WWII stock to a coherent, scalable South Island maintenance hub.[23]

Artist impression of the Burnham MSF Build. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2023-09/Burnham%20build.jpg

Linton RSF (ground broken late 2024; works underway 2025)

The Linton RSF consolidates deployable supply, regional pooling and distribution into a single integrated warehouse—modernising Linton’s logistics model and delivering genuine “one-roof” visibility of stock and movement. It replaces the camp’s last remaining WWII-era store building and the temporary sheds erected in the 1950s, retiring decades of piecemeal add-ons in favour of a purpose-designed, high-bay facility with efficient goods-in, cross-dock, and issue flows. Provision is made for dock-high loading with canopies and levellers, narrow-aisle racking with seismic bracing, controlled stores and DG rooms, quarantine/returns and kitting/staging areas, plus temperature-managed cells for sensitive items. Traffic is segregated for safety, with MHE circulation, marshalling hardstand and clear pedestrian routes; ESFR sprinklers, spill containment and energy-efficient services (with allowance for future solar/ICT upgrades) support compliance and resilience. Co-located with the Linton MSF, the RSF shortens pull-through from receipt to fit-line to road test, and builds surge capacity for exercises, operations and civil-support tasks across the lower North Island.[24]

Concept Plan of the Linton RSF.https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/media-centre/news/significant-milestone-for-nzdf-logistics/

Burnham RSF (approved)

Cabinet’s October 2025 release confirms the Burnham RSF as CLP Build 4, centralising storage and distribution to support the South Island force and national surge. The project retires Burnham’s remaining WWII-era store buildings—plus the ad hoc sheds that accreted over the post-war decades—and replaces them with a purpose-designed, high-bay warehouse that brings deployable supply, regional pooling, and distribution under one roof, with true end-to-end visibility. Dock-high loading with canopies and levellers, cross-dock lanes, narrow-aisle racking with seismic bracing, controlled stores and DG rooms, kitting/forward staging, quarantine/returns areas, and temperature-managed cells are planned into the base build. Safety and resilience are improved through segregated pedestrian/MHE routes, generous marshalling hardstand, ESFR sprinklers, spill containment, compliant waste streams, and energy-efficient services with allowance for future solar and ICT growth. Co-located with the new Burnham MSF, the RSF shortens pull-through from receipt to fit-line to road test, and provides scalable capacity for exercises, operations, and civil-defence tasks across the South Island.[25]

Artist impression of the Burnham Regional Supply Facility. https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/assets/Uploads/DocumentLibrary/EXP-25-MIN-0079_Defence-Force_Burnham-Regional-Supply-Facility.pdf

Why it matters

  1. Tempo & readiness: Centralised, high-bay warehouses and modern workshops cut turn-times on maintenance and issue, and make surge loads (exercises, operations, disaster response) predictable and scalable.
  2. Safety & compliance: New ammo hangars and workshops meet contemporary explosive safety, environmental and worker standards.
  3. Whole-of-force visibility: CLP infrastructure supports the “equip the force” model, pooling fleets and holdings where it makes sense while still serving units locally.
  4. Life-cycle efficiency: Purpose-built layouts reduce double-handling and shrink the estate of failing legacy buildings. Cabinet’s RSF approvals and the associated business cases lock in these gains.

The long arc

From the first Defence Stores and Mobilisation Stores in Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin; through the interwar Hopuhopu depot; via the wartime booms and post-war improvisations; to the missteps at Linton and Trentham that left too much in “temporary” accommodation, the RSF/MSF era is the long-intended destination: fit-for-purpose logistics infrastructure, finally scaled to the mission. The spades in the ground at Linton and Burnham, and the new ammunition hangars at Waiouru and Glentunnel, are not new ideas; they are the long-delayed completion of a project that began as New Zealand took responsibility for its own military stores more than a century ago.

Notes

[1]Paul Joseph Spyve, “The Barracks on the Hill: A History of the Army’s Presence at Mount Cook, Wellington 1843-1979” (1982).

[2] “The new powder magazine,” South Canterbury Times, Issue 2414, (Evening Post, Volume XVIII, Issue 102), 27 October 1879, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18791027.2.28.

[3] “New Power magazine at Mount Eden,” New Zealand Herald, Volume VIII, Issue 2377 (Auckland), 7 September 1871, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18710907.2.18.

[4] Wellington Defence Storekeeper, “Report of Inspection of Defence Stores Auckland. Again Urges Removal of Store from O’Rourke [O’rorke] Street to Mount Eden Cost to Be Met by Police Department ” Archives New Zealand Item No R24743403  (1903).

[5] “Joint Defence (Secret) Committee (Reports of the),” Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1900 Session I, I-12  (1 September 1900), https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/parliamentary/AJHR1900-I.2.3.3.15.

[6] Mark McGuire, “Equipping the Post-Bellum Army,” Forts and Works (Wellington) 2016.

[7] “Great Military Camp,” Auckland Star, Volume LVI, Issue 83, 8 April 1925, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19250408.2.62.

[8] “Ordnance Srores,” Evening Post, Volume C, Issue 95, 19 October 1920, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19201019.2.92.

[9] “Mount Cook Barracks,” Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 105, (Wellington), 31 October 1930, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19301031.2.57.

[10] “Fire in Defence Store,” Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3109 ( ), 13 June 1917, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170613.2.67.

[11] “Camp at Burnham,” Star, Issue 16298, 13 December 1920, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19201213.2.88.

[12] F Grattan, Official War History of the Public Works Department (PWD, 1948).

[13] “Inquiry into fire,” Northern Advocate, ( ), 27 February 1945, https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19450227.2.60.

[14] “Buildings, Linton Camp, Central Ordnance Depot,” Archives New Zealand No R9428308  (1955 – 1969).

[15] Grattan, Official War History of the Public Works Department.

[16] Grattan, Official War History of the Public Works Department.

[17] Grattan, Official War History of the Public Works Department.

[18] “Waiouru Explosive Srorage Depot – Stage 1,” Spantech NZ Limited  2006, https://www.spantech.co.nz/projects/waiouru-explosive-ordnance-depot-stage-1.

[19] “Waiouru Explosive Srorage Depot – Stage 2,” Spantech NZ Limited  2014, https://www.spantech.co.nz/projects/waiouru-explosive-ordnance-depot-stage-2.

[20] “Major upgrade of NZ Defence Force’s southern explosive ordnance storage facilities,” Spantech NZ Limited  2021, https://www.spantech.co.nz/projects/nz-defence-southern-ammunition-node-project.

[21] “Defence Capability Plan,” 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/assets/Uploads/DocumentLibrary/24-0253-NZDF-Defence-Capability-Plan-Single.pdf.

[22] New Zealand Defence Force, Linton Military Camp opens state-of-the-art maintenance facility to support NZ Army equipment,  (Wellington: NZDF, 2023).

[23] “New maintenance facility at Burnham Military Camp underway,” Beehive.co.nz, 2023, https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-maintenance-facility-burnham-military-camp-underway.

[24] “Significant milestone for NZDF logistics,” NZ Army, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/army/army-news/significant-milestone-for-nzdf-logistics/.

[25] “Defence Force: Burnham Regional Supply Facility,” Ministry of Defence, 2025, https://www.nzdf.mil.nz/assets/Uploads/DocumentLibrary/EXP-25-MIN-0079_Defence-Force_Burnham-Regional-Supply-Facility.pdf.

The estate underfoot is the real enemy

Leave a comment

New Zealand’s military logisticians are more likely to be harmed by the conditions they create than by enemy fire, and the records often don’t exist when illness appears decades later.

Introduction

We have spent years teaching soldiers to look up and out for threats. For logisticians, the danger is just as often down in the ground they’re ordered to seize and make work at speed. Bomb‑damaged ports, airheads, railheads, fuel farms, hard standing, and battered warehouses are where supply chains are wrestled back to life. They are also where dust, residues, and fluids leave a lasting fingerprint on human health.

The uncomfortable truth is latency. Low‑to‑moderate exposures, taken in with every sweep of a broom, every cut of a disc, every lift of a drum, every hour around fuels and degreasers, rarely trigger an incident report. They build quietly under heat and exertion. The bill often arrives 10–40 years later as chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular problems, or exposure‑associated cancers (including haematological malignancies). By then, units have disbanded, notebooks have been boxed or binned, and the link between a dusty floor in a shattered shed and a midlife diagnosis is far harder to prove.

Operational realities widen this gap. Operational tempo prioritises throughput over sampling; industrial hazards are treated as background noise; and protection is a general issue, not task-specific. In many theatres, the ethos was to get the job done. Keeping the lines moving eclipsed health and safety. The result? Too many logisticians carry “silent” injuries, not the wounds of a firefight, but the legacy of the estate underfoot.

Latency‑linked conditions to flag (illustrative, not exhaustive)

  • Airways & lung (0–20+ yrs): chronic bronchitis/COPD, asthma aggravation, interstitial lung disease; silica/cement dusts → silicosis; diesel/PAH‑rich exhaust → higher lung cancer risk.
  • Sarcoidosis (months–years; sometimes later): an inflammatory granulomatous disease with recognised associations to inhaled particulates and combustion by-products (e.g., burn-pit smoke, fuel/solvent aerosols, mineral/metallic dusts, silica). In military logistics contexts, credible exposure pathways include routine work around burn pits, JP-8/Avtur/Avgas combustion products, and dust-rich industrial sites.
  • Asbestos (20–40 yrs): pleural plaques, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma.
  • Solvents & fuels (5–25 yrs): Benzene and organic solvents are associated with haematological malignancies (e.g., AML, MDS, NHL); some degreasers are linked in studies to kidney/liver effects.
  • PCBs/dioxins (incl. Agent Orange/TCDD) (5–30+ yrs): non‑Hodgkin lymphoma, some soft‑tissue sarcomas, type 2 diabetes, chloracne.
  • Metals (varies): chromium VI → lung cancer; lead → neurological/haematological effects; cadmium → renal dysfunction and some cancers.

These are associations, not diagnoses. Individual risk depends on dose, duration, task and personal factors. The point is to signpost credible possibilities so exposure logging and follow‑up aren’t dismissed as “speculative”.

Illustrative exposure pathways reported by NZ logisticians

  • JP-8/Avtur/Avgas used to burn excrement (latrine waste disposal) → mixed hydrocarbon and particulate inhalation.
  • Proximity to burn pits for waste/rubbish disposal → complex combustion plume with fine particulates and mixed toxicants.
  • Asbestos exposure in damaged facilities — notably Somalia and Timor-Leste.
  • Pyrethrin-based insecticide ‘fogging’ for mosquitoes — operators in PPE while nearby logisticians worked without task-specific respiratory protection.
  • Silica and heavy dusts from industrial sites — e.g., Bougainville, living/working inside a large copper-mine building.

Somalia shows how routine logistics create hidden exposures

Mogadishu City 1993 https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3431954906943543&set=g.300124683407213

From late 1992 to July 1994, New Zealand rotated a dedicated Supply Platoon (43-strong, with an attached infantry section) through Mogadishu. The job was prosaic and relentless: a warehouse on the airport’s north ramp, a standing stores presence inside the port, and long days pushing relief tonnage through shattered infrastructure, at one point over 1,000 tonnes in a single month.

Mogadishu Port https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10150240772927867&set=oa.10150234748669659
UNOSOM General Stores Warehouse at Mogadishu Airport undergoes a few improvements 1993.jpg Crown Copyright © 2009 New Zealand Defence Force / All Rights Reserved

The ground itself told the story. Movements threaded past the ruins of an oil depot and fuel farms; across coral-sand and concrete dust; through mixed cargo residues (fertiliser, cement) laminated with marine oils and solvents; past derelict aircraft still weeping fluids, plus the familiar companions of collapse: metals, asbestos fragments, and sewage-affected water.

Derlict Aircradt exit from north ramp to port https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3261844550621247&set=oa.1415167846337616

Protection was largely standard kit, helmets, frag vests, uniforms, rather than any specialist respiratory or dermal protection you’d expect in an industrial clean-up. The then-issue light fragmentation vest was widely regarded as unsuitable for the operating environment: confidence-boosting, yes; protective against chronic industrial exposures, no. Dress and load carriage reflected the heat and tempo more than hazard control (UN blue caps/baseball caps, PASGT helmets variably covered; relaxed working dress; webbing often set aside to work in vehicles and warehouses).

Ruidemtary Burn pit https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3261848013954234&set=oa.1415167846337616

That is why ordinary tasks, sweeping bays, slinging pallets, cutting and rigging, refuelling, and marshalling MHE on contaminated hard-standing, can have extraordinary consequences years later when no one records what’s in the dust.

A recurring pattern across theatres

This is not an anomaly; it is a template visible across a century of New Zealand service:

  • World Wars — depots, docks, railheads (1914–19; 1939–45). Coal soot, cordite fumes, leaded petrol and chlorinated solvents in workshops; asbestos in roofing and lagging; cement and lime dust from rapid rebuilds. Throughput trumped surveys: trains to marshal, ships to turn, vehicles to repair. Hygiene focused on infection and water; industrial toxicology barely featured, so exposure notes were rare.
  • Korea — Kure and the Commonwealth base (1950–53). A sprawling pre-existing industrial estate re-tasked for logistics: oils, solvents and paints in abundance, metals and asbestos in shipyard fabric. NZ personnel moved through a machine built for output; documentation captured receipts and readiness, not the air and dust they worked in.
  • Malaya, Borneo and Singapore–Malaysia (1948–66; presence to 1989). Workshops and airstrips required fuels, degreasers, and hydraulic fluids as routine background; insecticides/defoliants were widely used; accommodations and facilities were still in the asbestos era. These were “normal” garrison tasks under tropical conditions, with latency risks unrecognised, and site hazards seldom logged.
  • Vietnam — Vũng Tàu and beyond (1964–72). Waste burning near lines of communication, pervasive dust, fuels/solvents, and herbicide-affected environments. Integration into Australian support chains normalised the setting; recognition came decades later at the cohort level, while many individual exposure trails remained thin.
  • Bougainville (1990s). Accommodation and work areas inside a large copper-mine building exposed personnel to silica-rich and metallic dust under hot, enclosed conditions.
  • Balkans — Bosnia/Kosovo rotations (mid-1990s–2000s). Logistics hubs established inside bomb-scarred industrial zones: transformer yards with PCBs, refineries, vehicle plants; warehouses with demolition dust and solvent films. Early-entry imperatives (“get the flow moving”) routinely outpaced site characterisation.
  • Timor-Leste (1999–2002). Burnt-out Indonesian-era facilities with asbestos roofing, ad-hoc waste pits, and heavy cement/brick dust from rapid repairs. Logbooks recorded cargo and convoy timings; personal exposure records were typically maintained only in the event of an incident.
  • Afghanistan (2003–2013). High-altitude fine dusts, continuous diesel exhaust, widespread solvent degreasing, and transits through hubs with burn-adjacent histories. The hazards were familiar yet diffuse, cumulative, not catastrophic, and thus rarely captured in neat exposure sheets.
  • Iraq — Taji and hub transits (from 2015). Flightline dusts, fuels/solvents, and the legacy of burn pits at specific coalition bases; constant MHE movements on contaminated hard standing. Unit logs were excellent for consignments and training cycles; environmental notes were sporadic and incident-driven.

The common pattern

Occupy damaged or industrialised ground → work at pace → accept “background” contamination as the price of tempo. Ordinary logistic tasks, such as sweeping, cutting, rigging, refuelling, and marshalling MHE, become exposure pathways, and latency hides the bill until long after the paperwork stops.

Why proof is missing — and why that shouldn’t be fatal

Exposures often fail to appear in files because command salience sits with security and throughput; coalitions churn and records fragment; hygiene doctrine long prioritised infection and water over industrial toxicology; and latency outlasts memory. Compounding this, many hazards that are now recognised and routinely mitigated, legacy asbestos, diesel-exhaust particulates and cumulative solvent exposure were, even less than thirty years ago, poorly understood or not considered in planning, PPE issues, or environmental reconnaissance. That is why Parliament enacted the Veterans’ Support Act 2014 (VSA): a benevolent, merits-based scheme that requires decision-makers to act reasonably, apply natural justice, and ensure equal treatment of equal claims.

Two schemes, same principles

The VSA operates

  • Scheme One (older cohorts/legacy service) and
  • Scheme Two (modern deployments from 1 April 1974 onwards, with a stronger rehabilitation focus).

Both schemes operate under the Act’s principle of benevolence. New Zealand adopts medical-scientific Statements of Principles (SoPs) from Australia’s Repatriation Medical Authority. Each SoP lists causal factors that, if present, link a condition to service. Two standards of proof apply: Reasonable Hypothesis (RH) for warlike/non-warlike (operational) service, a pro-veteran, lower threshold; and Balance of Probabilities (BoP) for peacetime/routine service, a higher threshold.

How decisions should run in practice.

  1. If a relevant SoP exists, Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand (VANZ) tests the claim against it.
  2. If the RH test is met for qualifying operational service, the claim must be accepted.
  3. If no SoP applies or a SoP cannot neatly capture cumulative exposure, **section 15** applies: VANZ must accept the claim if it is consistent with a reasonable hypothesis based on the facts, unless there are reasonable grounds to believe it is not service‑related. This is the statutory safety‑net for thin or fragmented records.

Where veterans get tripped up when making a claim

Here is where the machinery breaks down: a process that treats missing records as the veteran’s problem and turns a benevolent scheme into an adversarial grind.

  • Thin records → heavy proof load on the veteran. Requests for exposure logs, sampling data, or site surveys that never existed end up weaponising the gaps the system created.
  • SoPs treated as gates, not guides. Complex, cumulative or novel exposures (multiple deployments, solvents, PCB yards) don’t map neatly to Statements of Principles, yet section 15 isn’t used early to accept a reasonable hypothesis.
  • Insurer-style posture. The process can feel adversarial, with repeated demands for “more” evidence, credibility challenges, and narrow readings of medical reports, especially when records are scarce.
  • Delay as denial. Multi-stage reconsideration/review/appeal stretches months into years; terminally ill veterans can die before resolution, or families inherit the burden mid-grief.
  • The state holds the data, while the veteran bears the risk. VANZ sits within NZDF, the institution with the records and institutional knowledge; yet, the evidential burden often rests with the ill claimant.
  • Language and culture mismatch. Claims framed like welfare applications rather than an earned entitlement under a State-fault scheme erode trust and deter engagement (contemporary veteran uptake is reported as extremely low).

If New Zealand truly values those who keep the lines moving, Veterans’ Affairs and the NZDF must do better: shift their efforts from surge-time forms to credible post-tour evidence so that tomorrow’s veteran has a fair shot.

When proof is already thin: build a triangle of proof

  • Tasks & places: diaries, load lists, movement tables, port/airfield names, ramp IDs, warehouse numbers, fuel farm locations, photos.
  • Site history: industrial uses, conflict damage, spill/burn areas, foam pads, mining legacies, and why it was dirty.
  • Medical trajectory: onset windows, peers with similar issues, GP/specialist notes and screening results.

Conclusion

Operationally, the principal danger to military logisticians is often not incoming fire but the estate underfoot, ground that must be made serviceable at pace and under pressure. Somalia serves as a national wake-up call: ordinary logistics in extraordinary environments, mainly undertaken in general-issue kit, with little of the exposure ever documented. Many hazards now recognised and routinely mitigated, such as legacy asbestos, diesel particulates, PCB yards, and cumulative solvent loads, were poorly understood or not considered less than thirty years ago, which only widens today’s evidential gaps.

Even so, that counsel comes too late for many operations up to the early 2000s, when industrial hazards were poorly understood and exposure logs were uncommon. Even if the chaos of early entry cannot be redesigned, commanders and agencies can still complete the process correctly by creating a usable record. A succinct post-tour bundle, filed with personnel records and the unit archive, should include:

  • a task/location timeline,
  • sketch maps and photographs of sites worked,
  • a note of known or likely prior industrial uses,
  • brief witness statements,
  • unit diaries and load/consignment lists,
  • and GP/screening notes (e.g., spirometry where relevant).

Decades later, this modest package can be the difference between a fair hearing and a polite denial. Where no bundle exists for historic tours, assemble the best available reconstruction from diaries, photos, unit logs, site histories, and medical notes.

On the claims side, practice should match principle. Decision-making ought to reflect the benevolent, merits-based intent of the law; use multiple pathways (SoPs and reasonable-hypothesis routes); and adopt a culture that investigates rather than contests. Independent oversight, separate from VANZ and NZDF, would help ensure that the absence of paperwork does not become the absence of justice.

Sustaining the 2NZEF in WWII (1939–46): A Consolidated Register of New Zealand Logistics Units

Leave a comment

New Zealand’s logistic contribution to the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force (2NZEF) during the Second World War is too often glimpsed only in passing—scattered lines in campaign narratives or one-line entries in corps lists. This article assembles, for the first time, a clear, consolidated register of New Zealand logistics units that sustained 2NZEF across its principal theatres of war: North Africa & the Middle East (1940–43), Greece & Crete (1941), and Italy (1943–45). The scope is deliberately bounded, focusing solely on New Zealand formations and excluding the numerous Allied logistics organisations—RASC, RAOC, REME, and those of the Indian, South African, Australian, Canadian, and United States forces—that operated alongside them.

Join up of Tobruk garrison and the 8th Army at Tobruk, Libya, during World War II. New Zealand. Department of Internal Affairs. War History Branch Ref: DA-01668-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23108170

Context: Establishment and early expansion of 2NZEF logistics

The outbreak of war necessitated the creation of the 2NZEF as a new, expeditionary force, distinct from existing Territorial and regular Army structures. Its logistical backbone had to be built at speed—leveraging what existed at home, but scaling far beyond it. Under Lieutenant Colonel Stanley Crump, the New Zealand Army Service Corps (NZASC) began forming for overseas service almost immediately. Within a week of mobilisation, Territorial soldiers and civilian volunteers were concentrated at Papakura, Ngāruawāhia, Trentham, and Burnham for intensive training, laying the foundations for a motorised division sustained by transport, fuel, and supply-chain units.

Ordnance functions for the expeditionary force were organised under a newly established New Zealand Ordnance Corps (NZOC)—separate from the domestically focused NZAOC. Led by Colonel Joseph King as Director of Ordnance Services, the NZOC was raised largely from scratch by drawing on NZAOC depot personnel and civilian staff. A key innovation was the introduction of Light Aid Detachments (LADs) attached to front-line units for rapid repairs, with Captain Sinclair Banks Wallace, the Ordnance Mechanical Engineer, instrumental in recruiting and training these cadres.

Deployment and scaling

The 2NZEF deployed in three major echelons (Advance Party; First Echelon to Egypt, February 1940; Third Echelon to Egypt, September 1940; Second Echelon first to Britain, then joining in Egypt, March 1941). Lieutenant-General Bernard Freyberg exercised broad administrative autonomy to establish bases, lines of communication, and procurement outside constrained British channels where necessary. On arrival in Egypt, New Zealand logisticians met a Middle East theatre strained by post-Dunkirk shortages. The original logistics structure proved insufficient for a fully motorised division, prompting rapid expansion across supply, transport, maintenance, and repair to meet the demands of desert warfare—an effort that would underpin operations in North Africa & the Middle East (1940–43), Greece & Crete (1941), and Italy (1943–45).

NZASC Divisional supply & transport

Diamond T Tank Transporter of 18 Tank Transporter Company
  • NZASC Headquarters (Divisional)
  • NZ Divisional Supply Column → 2 NZ Divisional Supply Company (renamed 1942; disbanded 8 Oct 1945)
  • 2 NZ Divisional Petrol Company (disbanded 8 Oct 1945)
  • 2 NZ Divisional Ammunition Company
    • Second Ammunition Company formed Nov 1942 (both disbanded 8 Oct 1945)
  • 4 Reserve Mechanical Transport (RMT) Company (disbanded 8 Oct 1945)
  • 6 Reserve Mechanical Transport (RMT) Company (raised 1942; disbanded Nov 1944)

Specialised divisional units

  • 14 NZ Anti-Aircraft Regiment ASC Section
  • 1 NZ Ambulance Transport Unit
  • 18 NZ Tank Transport Company (From 1942)
  • 2 NZ Field Bakery Section (later expanded outputs)
  • 1 NZ Mule Pack Company (1943)
  • NZ Water Issue Section
  • NZ Tank Delivery Troop → Forward Delivery Squadron
  • NZ Jeep Platoon

Base & Lines of Communication (Middle East/Italy)

  • Headquarters Base ASC
    • later 6 NZ Division ASC (for deception), then HQ NZASC Maadi Camp → absorbed into NZ Maadi Camp Composite Company (continued to 26 Feb 1946)
  • NZ Base Training Depot (disbanded 1944) → NZ Advanced Base ASC Training Depot (Italy, to mid-1945)
  • Base Transport Depot → 17 NZ General Transport Company (LoC transport; integrated into NZ Maadi Camp Composite Company in 1945)
  • NZ Field Bakery → NZ Catering Depot (disbanded 1944)
  • NZ Cookery School (assumed catering training functions)
  • 100 Detail Issue Depot (DID)
  • 101 Detail Issue Depot (DID)

NZOC Depots, parks, training & specialist units

A group of NZAOD personnel in Italy, 1944. Front Row: H.D. Bremmer, R.G James, 2nd Lieutenant H.J. Mackridge, N.G. Hogg, G.P. Seymour. Back Row: WO2 Worth, D.S Munroe, G Caroll, Charles Joseph Moulder, Francis William Thomas Barnes, H Rogers, C.W Holmes, W Wallace, N Denery. Photo: Defence Archive Collection, Alexander Turnbull Library.
  • New Zealand Base Ordnance Depot (NZ BOD) – Middle East hub
    • 1 NZ BOD (Egypt; from 16 Feb 1944)
    • 2 NZ BOD (Italy; from 16 Feb 1944)
  • New Zealand Advanced Ordnance Depot (NZAOD) – forward mobile depot; later integrated into OFP as an Advanced Ordnance Section (Feb 1944)
  • NZ Stores Convoy Unit – sub-unit of 2 NZ BOD for long-haul LoC lifts
  • Ordnance Field Park (OFP) – divisional forward supply/repair park
  • NZ Divisional Mobile Laundry and Forward Decontamination Unit →NZ Divisional Mobile Laundry from Mar 1942 (Disbanded Sept 1942)
  • NZ Divisional Bath Unit (Disbanded Sept 1942)
  • NZ Base Laundry (from Sept 1942) → NZ Mobile Laundry (From 1 Oct 1943) → NZ Mobile Laundry and Bath Unit
  • Salvage Unit – battlefield recovery and salvage
  • Armourers’ School of Instruction (NZ BOD) – weapons maintenance training
  • NZ Ordnance Corps Depot (Maadi) – personnel admin/reinforcements (from 26 Jul 1941)

Workshops & maintenance (NZOC until transfer to NZEME on 1 Dec 1942)

  • Base Ordnance Workshops & Technical Training Centre (from 1 Oct 1941) → retitled 6 NZ Division Ordnance Workshops (6 Jul 1942)
  • 1 NZ Ordnance Field Workshop (from 16 Jun 1941)
  • 2 NZ Ordnance Field Workshop (from 16 Jun 1941)
  • 3 NZ Ordnance Field Workshop (from 16 Jun 1941)
  • 2 NZ Divisional Ordnance Workshops (from 26 Jun 1941)
  • 5 NZ Infantry Brigade Workshop Section (from 1 Aug 1942)
  • 6 NZ Infantry Brigade Workshop Section (from 1 Aug 1942)
  • 4th New Zealand Armoured Brigade Workshops (formed around the cadre of 11 LAD)
  • 14 NZ Anti-Aircraft Workshops Section
  • NZ Ordnance Corps Training Section (workshops cadre/training)
  • 31 Light Aid Detachment (Base) – merged into Base Ordnance Workshops Jan 1942

Light Aid Detachments (LADs) – NZOC to NZEME transfer on 1 Dec 1942

  • 9 LAD – 4 Field Regiment
  • 10 LAD – 5 Field Park
  • 11 LAD – HQ 4 Infantry Brigade (later core of 4 NZ Armd Bde Workshops)
  • 12 LAD – 27 NZ (MG) Battalion
  • 13 LAD – 2 NZ Divisional Cavalry
  • 14 LAD – Divisional Signals
  • 15 LAD – 7 Anti-Tank Regiment
  • 16 LAD – 5 Field Regiment
  • 17 LAD – HQ 5 NZ Infantry Brigade
  • 18 LAD – 6 Field Regiment
  • 19 LAD – HQ 6 NZ Infantry Brigade
  • 31 LAD (Base) – see above

Demobilisation/closure

  • NZ BODs, NZAOD, OFP and remaining NZOC units – formally disbanded by 26 Feb 1946.

New Zealand Electrical and Mechanical Engineers (NZEME) — formed 1 Dec 1942 (from NZOC repair/maintenance functions).

Members of 10 Light Aid Detachment, NZ Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, attached to 5 NZ Fd Park Coy, changing truck engine, probably at Burbeita. Man in peaked cap identified as Lt G D Pollock, later Col Pollock. Taken circa 1941 by an official photographer. Ref: DA-01035-F. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/22485028

Light Aid Detachments (LADs)

  • 9 NZ LAD (4 Field Regiment) — disbanded 15 Dec 1945
  • 10 NZ LAD (5 Field Park) — disbanded 15 Dec 1945
  • 13 NZ LAD (2 NZ Divisional Cavalry) — disbanded 1 Nov 1944
  • 14 NZ LAD (Divisional Signals) — disbanded 15 Dec 1945
  • 15 NZ LAD (7 Anti-Tank Regiment) — disbanded Dec 1945
  • 16 NZ LAD (5 Field Regiment) — disbanded Dec 1945
  • 35 NZ LAD (22 Motorised Battalion) — formed 1 Dec 1942; disbanded 1 Nov 1944
  • 38 NZ LAD (18 Armoured Regiment) — disbanded 15 Dec 1945
  • 39 NZ LAD (19 Armoured Regiment) — disbanded 15 Dec 1945
  • 40 NZ LAD (20 Armoured Regiment) — disbanded Dec 1945
  • 41 NZ LAD (HQ 2NZEF) — formed May 1943; disbanded Dec 1945

Workshops & repair units

  • 4 NZ Armoured Brigade Workshop — formed 1 Dec 1942; disbanded 21 Sep 1945
  • 6 NZ Divisional Workshop — formed 1 Dec 1942; retitled NZ Maadi Camp Workshops 1 Nov 1944
  • 2 NZ Divisional Workshop — ex 2 NZ Divisional Ordnance Workshop; operated to 4 Jan 1946
  • NZ Advanced Base Workshops — formed 6 Dec 1943; disbanded 31 Dec 1945

Recovery

  • 1 NZ Armoured Troops Recovery Unit — formed Apr 1943 → 1 NZ Heavy Recovery Section Nov 1944; disbanded 17 Sep 1945

Training

  • NZEME Training Company — formed Dec 1942

NZEF theatre/army-level logistics enablers (1940–1946)

Port Detachments (NZEF)

  • 1 NZ Port Detachment — Suez HQ; formalised 20 Dec 1942; disbanded 1 Nov 1945.
  • 2 NZ Port Detachment — Benghazi → Tripoli; disbanded 30 Jan 1946.
  • 3 NZ Port Detachment — Bari (Italy); formed 8 Nov 1943; disbanded 26 Feb 1946.

Medical Supply (NZMC within NZEF)

  • NZ Medical Stores Depot — established Oct 1940 (Capt Gordon Peek); disbanded 26 Feb 1946.

Corps-level supply nodes

  • New Zealand Field Maintenance Centre (FMC) – Section “A” → 1 NZ FMC — formed 18 Oct 1941, redesignated 5 Dec 1941; operated to 27 Apr 1942; recalled and disbanded 2 May 1942.
  • New Zealand Field Maintenance Centre (FMC) – Section “B” → 2 NZ FMC — formed 18 Oct 1941, redesignated 5 Dec 1941; operated to 27 Apr 1942; recalled and disbanded 2 May 1942.

Note: Thereafter, 2NZEF drew from higher-Corps FMCs (numbered series, e.g., “50s” for XIII Corps, “60s” for XXX Corps) manned by British troops.

New Zealand’s Second Front: 2NZEF (Pacific), 1940–44

The 2NZEF raised a distinct Pacific Section to defend Fiji, initially centred on 8 Infantry Brigade which landed on Viti Levu in November 1940. After Japan entered the war, the force expanded to two brigades and was formally designated as the Pacific Section, 2NZEF, under Major General Owen Mead. When the United States 37th Division assumed the Fiji garrison, the New Zealand formation redeployed home. The Pacific Section subsequently became the 3rd New Zealand Division, the 2NZEF’s primary formation in the Pacific. After a period of training in New Zealand, the Division fought as tailored brigade groups in the Solomon Islands campaign of 1943–44—specifically, on Vella Lavella, the Treasury Islands, and the Green Islands—rather than as a whole three-brigade division.

In early 1944, a national manpower crisis—balancing the need for two overseas divisions with the requirement for essential agricultural and industrial output—forced a strategic choice. Following consultation with British and United States authorities, Wellington prioritised the 2nd Division in Italy; the 3rd Division was withdrawn to New Caledonia in June, returned to New Zealand in August, and was formally disbanded on 20 October 1944. Roughly 4,000 veterans were posted to reinforce the 2nd Division; the remainder demobilised to civilian roles.

Against this operational backdrop, the Division built a theatre-specific sustainment system aligned to US logistics. NZASC carried out reception, trunking, rations, POL, and field services; NZOC managed receipt/issue, accounting, repair, and recovery—and unlike the Middle East, first- and second-line repair remained within NZOC (no NZEME split). The model was proven in Fiji (1940–42) and then scaled in New Caledonia (late 1942–44):

Fiji (1940–42)

Fiji was New Zealand’s first defended base in the South Pacific and the springboard for later operations. From late 1940, the NZASC and NZOC established an island-wide sustainment network—port reception, road/rail/coastal lighterage, depots, and first- and second-line repair—that matured into the model carried forward to New Caledonia and the Solomons.

NZASC

  • Headquarters, Divisional ASC (cadre) — policy/trunking coordination as the garrison approached divisional strength.
  • 4th Composite Company — Suva/Samabula: port clearance, ration issues, local lift to 8 Infantry Brigade Group.
  • 16th Composite Company — Lautoka/Namaka/Nadi (from January 1942): western area support to 14 Infantry Brigade and RNZAF at Nadi.
  • Reserve Motor Transport (New Zealand & Fiji Sections) — vehicle assembly, convoying, inter‑island interfaces, and surge trunking.
  • Movement Control detachments — Suva and Lautoka wharf organisation and clearance.

NZOC

  • DADOS office — technical control and accounting; integration with NZASC issues and returns.
  • Base Ordnance Depot — Suva/Samabula/Tamavua: receipt/issue/returns; armoury; tailoring/textiles (uniform and tent repair).
  • Divisional Ordnance Workshops — HQ/Main (east) with B‑section (west): MT and armament repair; roving fitters; instrument work as capacity grew.
  • Ammunition points — segregation by nature, humidity mitigation, and range supply/accounting.
  • Fiji Section (from mid‑1942) — residual ordnance/workshop capacity supporting the Fiji Infantry Brigade Group and RNZAF Nausori after divisional redeployment.
  • Light Aid Detachments
    • 20 Light Aid Detachment — arrived November 1940; first‑line repair/recovery for 8 Brigade; based initially at Suva/Nasese area.
    • 36 Light Aid Detachment — arrived early 1942; supported Fiji Infantry Brigade Group and residual tasks.
    • 37 Light Aid Detachment — arrived early 1942; aligned to 14 Brigade; forward tasks in western area.

Medical Stores

  • Advanced Depot of Medical Stores (ADMS): Set up at Tamavua Hospital in 1941 (one sergeant, one private, one dispenser).-  equipped two hospitals, two light field ambulances, a convalescent depot, an infectious-diseases hospital, and RAPs for two brigade groups.

Norfolk Island (N‑Force), 1942–44

New Zealand agreed with US command to garrison Norfolk Island in late 1942. N‑Force was a weak brigade‑type grouping (~1,483 personnel over its lifetime) with limited vehicles (≈117 total), requiring tight movement schedules, careful road maintenance, and high utilisation of scarce transport.

NZASC

  • Composite/MT Detachments — local distribution, ration issues, POL, and engineer/AA ammunition lift under island constraints.
  • Movement Control — wharf/boat‑landing control, surf boat interfaces, and cross‑decking to lighter craft.
  • Field Bakery Detachment — bread supply for the garrison as required.

NZOC

  • Ordnance & MT Workshop Section — first‑/second‑line repair retained within NZOC (no NZEME split in the Pacific).
  • Ordnance Section — receipt/issue/returns, clothing/textiles, and ammunition accounting adjusted to island stockholding levels.

Tonga (T‑Force), 1942–44

T‑Force, based around 16 Infantry Brigade Group, garrisoned Tonga from late 1942. The force totalled ~860 personnel and was issued ≈221 vehicles (as at February 1943), reflecting greater mobility demands across dispersed sites and the need to interface with US movement plans.

NZASC

  • Composite/MT Detachments — port clearance, ration and water distribution, and inter‑island/airfield runs.
  • Movement Control — coordination with US shipping/air movements; beach‑landing control where required.
  • Field Bakery Detachment — bread supply for garrison and detachments.

NZOC

  • Ordnance & MT Workshop Section — first‑line repair/recovery
  • Ordnance Section — depot functions (receipt/issue/returns), clothing/textiles, and ammunition handling appropriate to garrison scale.

New Caledonia (late 1942–44

After a period of reconstitution and training in New Zealand, in late 1942 the Division re-based to New Caledonia and, under US Services of Supply, consolidated a west-coast logistics corridor—from the Nouméa/Népoui ports through Base Supply Depots at Vallée de Limousin to the Bourail BOD and Moindah Workshops—knitting reception, trunking, and issue via NZASC MT/MC while first- and second-line repair remained within NZOC..

NZASC

  • HQ Divisional ASC (CRASC & staff) — policy, priorities, and synchronisation with US Services of Supply.
  • Base Supply Depot (BSD) No. 1 — Vallée de Limousin (Nouméa area) rear buffer; staging at Dumbéa.
  • Base Supply Depot (BSD) No. 2 — forward stocks up the west coast road system.
  • Movement Control Detachments — Nouméa & Népoui port/rail interfaces; launch Roa for water transport.
  • Camp McCrae Port Detachment (≈550 personnel) — three-shift port clearance alongside US units.
  • 10 Reserve Motor Transport Company — HQ Moindah; swing lift and major port-clearance/worked convoys.
  • Composite Companies (island distribution)
    • 4 Composite (Népoui/Plaine des Gaïacs, 8 Inf Bde);
    • 16 Composite (Ouaco–Koumac/Taom River line, 14 Inf Bde);
    • 29 Composite (Néméara–Bourail–Houaïlou, Div Troops).
  • 4th Motor Ambulance Convoy (4 MAC – deployed to New Caledonia January 1943. Cars were positioned with field ambulances across the island and at 4 NZ General Hospital (Boguen/Dumbéa), Base Camp Reception Hospital (Téné) and Nouméa.
  • 1 Field Bakery Detachments — bread supply at base/forward as required.
  • 1 Field Butchery

Solomons (1943–44):

  • Guadalcanal
    • HQ Div ASC (fwd) staged onward movement to assault groupings; ASC elements moved via Efate on US shipping.
    • 4 MAC linked ports, airstrips and hospitals in the evacuation chain.
  • Vella Lavella (18 Sep 1943
    • 10 Motor Transport Company ran bulk dumps and onward cross-loads (engineer plant, aviation stores, ammunition).
    • 4 MAC maintained casualty mobility under rain, raids and primitive tracks.
  • Treasury Islands (27 Oct 1943)
    • 4 Motor Transport Company opened the beach-group roadhead and pushed early priorities.
    • 4 MAC Detachment
    • BSD No. 2 Detachment
    • Field Bakery Detachment.
  • Green Islands/Nissan (15 Feb 1944)
    • 16 Motor Transport Company provided the main lift;
    • 10 MT Detachment
    •  4 MAC Detachment.
    • Field Bakery Detachment.

NZOC

Base depots & workshops — New Caledonia (late 1942–44):

  • Base Ordnance Depot (BOD), Bourail — central distribution; textiles/tent repair capability recorded.
  • Divisional Ordnance Workshops, Moindah
    •  HQ/Main Workshop
    • Armament Section
    • No 1 Recovery Section
    • No 2 Recovery Section

Light Aid Detachments (NZOC in Pacific):

  • 20 LAD (Fiji 1940–42; New Caledonia/Solomons 1943–44)
  • 36 LAD (Fiji residual 1942–43)
  • 37 LAD (Fiji 1942; Vella Lavella 1943)
  • 42 LAD (from Jul 1943, with 38 Field Regiment)
  • 64 LAD (Treasury Islands 1943–44)
  • 65 LAD (New Caledonia/Green Islands 1944)
  • 67 LAD (New Caledonia 1943–44)
  • 29 LAA Workshop (section) (Vella Lavella/Green)

Solomons (1943-44)

  • Guadalcanal (Lunga–Kukum–Matanikau)
    • Advanced Ordnance Depot (AOD)
    • Advanced Ordnance Workshops (AOW)
      • Armament Section
      • Section of HQ/Main Workshop
      • Recovery Sections Nos. 1 & 2
  • Vella Lavella
    • detachments of 20 & 37 LADNo. 2 Recovery Section Detachment
    • 29 Light AA Workshop (section).
  • Treasury Islands (Mono & Stirling)
    • 64 LAD as principal mechanical element; ammunition breakdown and refrigeration/distillation plant maintenance; radar support under persistent air threat.
  • Green Islands/Nissan (Operation SQUAREPEG) — mission-tailored
    • ‘Squarepeg Workshop’ combining vehicle/artillery/instrument trades with radar and a tank workshop section; reduced parties from 20 & 65 LAD; small 29 LAA Workshop team.

Medical Stores

New Caledonia (late 1942–44

  • ADMS:  established a large warehouse at Téné (Racecourse Camp)

Solomons (1943–44):

  • Guadalcanal FMC:
    •  ADMS forward section opened alongside AOD/AOW
  • Vella Lavella
    • ADMS forward section
  • Treasury (Mono/Stirling)
    • ADMS forward section
  • Green Islands (Nissan)
    • ADMS forward section

The Mystery of the Ordnance Tubs

Leave a comment

Tracing Imperial Logistics through a Forgotten Artefact

During a recent visit to the New Zealand Army Museum, a cast-iron tub stood quietly on display—unassuming, heavily worn, and stamped with the crest of the British Board of Ordnance, along with the date 1850. At first glance, it appeared to be a utilitarian container. Yet this artefact, along with others held in storage, opens a window into the rarely told story of military logistics in colonial New Zealand—and more specifically, into the legacy of the Military Store Department and its pivotal role in sustaining Imperial operations during the New Zealand Wars.

Ordnance Tub National Army Museum Te Mata Toa

Legacy of the Board of Ordnance

The tub bears the insignia of the Board of Ordnance, a British institution that existed from 1597 to 1855. Charged with overseeing the supply of arms, ammunition, fortifications, and barracks, the Board held enormous responsibility across the British Empire. In New Zealand, it established offices in Auckland and Wellington during the 1840s, ensuring the provisioning of Imperial forces.

The Crimean War’s administrative fallout led to the abolition of the Board in 1855. In 1857, its civil functions were reorganised under the Military Store Department. That transition extended to the colonies, including New Zealand, where ordnance officers such as William Plummer and Joseph Osbertus Hamley were reassigned to the new structure.


Ammunition box with Board of Ordnance shield, initials and broad arrow, Tower of London. https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Board_of_Ordnance

The Rise of the Military Store Department in New Zealand

Between 1857 and 1870, the Military Store Department was the key body responsible for ensuring that the British soldier was “well and comfortably clad and amply supplied with the munitions of war.” Though smaller and often overshadowed by the more publicly known Commissariat, the Military Store Department played an indispensable role.

Hamley, initially arriving in New Zealand in 1847 as Deputy Ordnance Storekeeper in Wellington, assumed charge of all ordnance operations following Plummer’s death in 1859. As Deputy Superintendent of Stores, Hamley would oversee operations throughout the New Zealand Wars, including management of the extensive storage infrastructure at Fort Britomart and Albert Barracks in Auckland.

These depots housed thousands of items—uniforms, weapons, artillery fittings, ammunition, hospital comforts, and critical supplies—for an Imperial force that swelled to over 18,000 by 1864. Within this complex system of magazines and stores, the now-mysterious cast-iron tubs likely once played a humble yet vital role.

The Enigmatic Tubs

Numerous examples of these distinctive cast iron tubs are held in museums across New Zealand and abroad, yet their original function remains elusive. The New Zealand Army Museum has several, including one currently on display in a World War I diorama, likely as a generic military prop rather than with confirmed historical accuracy. This ambiguity reflects a broader uncertainty surrounding these artefacts.

MetL Tub with Board of Ordnance Arms, 1846. https://collectionswa.net.au/items/6bbf9a4c-9651-434b-aa3f-ded2680b690f#

Comparable tubs have been found in various settings, reinforcing the notion that their use may have extended beyond a single military function. For instance:

  • MOTAT (Museum of Transport and Technology) in Auckland holds tubs dated to the 1850s that bear the crest of the Board of Ordnance. Some are marked “C. Robinson / Stourbridge,” pointing to a standard manufacturer and suggesting standardised production across the Empire.
  • Similar tubs have been found in former military storage sites at Spitbank Fort in the UK and the Victoria Gunpowder Magazine in Hobart, further supporting the theory that they were initially intended for storing or transporting ammunition or other ordnance supplies.
  • A blog exploring the Irish city of Cork notes the presence of a “Cannon Bath” at Murphy Barracks in Ballincollig, reputedly used to contain water for extinguishing stray gunpowder or to support artillery cleaning routines. Although anecdotal, this local adaptation echoes 19th-century military practice, where equipment was routinely repurposed in garrison life.
Cannonball Container [Horse trough] at Auckland’s Museum of Transport and Technology (MOTAT). https://collection.motat.nz/objects/73823/cannonball-container-horse-trough

Beyond military institutions, these tubs have entered the antiques market with similarly varied interpretations:

  • A tub advertised by Bucks Retro & Vintage is described as a 19th-century blacksmith’s quenching trough, featuring similar dimensions but no Board of Ordnance crest. This example, attributed to “Cobbs, Makers Lane End, Bucks,” hints at broader industrial uses in the same era.
  • The Holloways Garden Antiques website offers a cast iron trough dated 1831, stamped with the Board of Ordnance crest and a gunner’s insignia of three cannons. Listed as a probable quenching tank, it remains watertight and is now marketed as a water feature—again showcasing the durability and adaptability of such artefacts.

A Blogsite exploring Irish city of Cork (https://corkobviously.weebly.com/chapter-11—cannons.html) has another  example listed as a CANNON BATH. This example is in the old Murphy Barracks in Ballincollig and it is thought that it was  used to contain water and was used over any stray gunpowder that may be dropped on the ground. If it remained dry, it might spark and create a mini-explosion.
​
It may be that the water was used for the sponge to cool down that inside of the cannon.

https://corkobviously.weebly.com/chapter-11—cannons.html
https://corkobviously.weebly.com/chapter-11—cannons.html

Despite these varied sightings and interpretations, no known period illustrations or photographs depict these tubs in actual use. Contemporary engravings and early photographs more commonly show cannonballs stored in open pyramids beside artillery or laid out on platforms. The absence of visual documentation neither confirms nor disproves their use as ammunition containers, but it leaves the theory unverified.

Their consistent form unites all these examples: sturdy, sealable, and enduring. While their precise military function may remain speculative, their wide geographic spread and recurrence in military and industrial contexts suggest they were a standard logistical item, adaptable to multiple roles—from transporting charge bags to holding water for artillery drills or firefighting. Their mystery lies not in their design but in the quiet versatility that saw them serve many needs, often beyond what was initially intended.

Function, Transport, and Adaptive Reuse

Given the size and design of these tubs, it is plausible they were initially intended for the bulk transport of ammunition from the United Kingdom to colonial garrisons around the globe. When packed with straw or similar material and sealed with a lid, cannonballs or shot could be safely transported by sea. Once landed in New Zealand, moving these heavy cast iron containers from the ship to the magazine would have presented logistical challenges, likely requiring lifting gear and wagons.

However, rather than for cannonballs, it is more likely that these tubs could have been used for the transport of pre-filled charge bags—a more refined and practical form of ammunition supply. A charge bag was a tightly sewn cloth bag filled with a specific weight of black powder, used to fire a gunpowder-era artillery piece. These were a safer, more manageable alternative to loose powder, allowing gunners to select a charge appropriate to the desired range and effect.

For example, in 1870, New Zealand had 16 iron garrison guns in service: three 32-pounders, eight 24-pounders, and five 12-pounders. Each gun required different charge weights depending on range and firing conditions. Charge bags for these guns could range from 2-pound to 6-pound loads of powder. The safe and dry transport of such bags would have been a priority, and the cast iron tubs—sturdy, lidded, and sealable—may have served as ideal shipping and storage containers for this purpose.

This interpretation aligns with their robust construction and the logistical emphasis on safe transport and storage of volatile materials in colonial military supply chains..

Their use in the field would have been impractical. Instead, they were more suited to coastal artillery magazines or fixed fortifications, which could be repurposed for continued storage.

One compelling theory, supported by overseas practices, is that once emptied of their contents, these tubs were reused as general-purpose water containers. In static defences such as Fort Britomart and Albert Barracks, they may have been filled with water and kept ready for two essential duties:

  1. Swabbing gun barrels after firing – a crucial maintenance task in artillery operations, especially in coastal and fixed defences.
  2. Firefighting reserve – strategically placed as an immediate water source in the event of a fire, particularly important given the proximity of powder stores and wooden infrastructure.

This theory fits within the broader ethos of 19th-century military logistics, where economy, adaptability, and reusability were central to operations, especially in isolated colonial postings.

A Tangible Link to Hamley’s Store Empire

These tubs, mundane though they may seem, reflect the layered logistical reality of Hamley’s era. Under his stewardship, the Military Store Department operated a vast system of interconnected depots, regional outposts, and forward delivery operations supporting British and colonial troops. Hamley and his officers—many of whom had risen through the ranks or transferred from other Corps—personally supervised store deliveries, field logistics, and the refurbishment of returned equipment.

For example, during the Waikato campaign, Assistant Superintendent Archibald Macduff personally oversaw the delivery of blankets and uniforms to troops at Te Awamutu. At Fort Britomart, nine storehouses, workshops, and the central magazine system formed what we might now call a logistics hub, supplying everything from rifle screws to tents and field hospital gear.

The Military Store Department continued its operations until the drawdown of Imperial forces. As British regiments departed from 1866 onwards, provincial depots were closed and centralised stores consolidated. In 1870, with the withdrawal of the final Imperial units, Fort Britomart’s contents were shipped back to Britain, and responsibility passed to the fledgling New Zealand Defence Stores.

A Legacy Worth Reclaiming

Though eclipsed in the historical record by the Commissariat, the Military Store Department—and men like Joseph Osbertus Hamley—deserve renewed attention. The effectiveness of the department was quietly acknowledged at the time. General Sir Duncan Cameron, commanding British forces in New Zealand, once remarked that no department was more efficient or less prone to conflict than the Military Store Department.

Today, the surviving tubs stamped with the Board of Ordnance crest are among the few physical relics of this largely forgotten organisation. Their survival is a testament to the robust material culture of British military supply chains and offers a rare, tangible link to the operations overseen by figures like Hamley.

Their continued presence in museum collections—despite their uncertain purpose—reminds us that every artifact holds the potential to illuminate untold stories. These “mystery tubs” are more than industrial curiosities; they are quiet witnesses to the empire’s reach and the ingenuity of those who kept its armies marching.